Posted on 04/22/2025 8:19:14 PM PDT by Red Badger
Over the past two decades, a reclusive Swiss billionaire has poured more than $800 million into left-wing causes across America, and now states are fighting back.
Hansjörg Wyss, 89, a Swiss national with an estimated net worth of roughly five billion dollars, has quietly become one of the most influential donors on the American left. He has spent more than $800 million bankrolling hundreds of left-wing causes across the United States, donating millions to climate change groups, abortion activists, and the Clinton Foundation.
Information about him is sparse, but his sister once wrote that Wyss seeks to “(re)interpret the American Constitution in the light of progressive politics.”
Foreign nationals are prohibited from contributing to candidates or PACs under federal law. Even though Wyss is not a citizen, or even a green card holder, he has developed a sophisticated system to become a “leading source of difficult-to-trace money to groups associated with Democrats,” according to the New York Times.
A report from election watchdog Americans for Public Trust (APT) reveals that Wyss created two nonprofits—the Wyss Foundation and the Berger Action Fund — which have funneled close to $500 million into a vast network of Democratic-aligned dark money groups. Much of this funding has gone to organizations managed by Arabella Advisors, the “mothership” of left-wing dark money.
The largest beneficiary has been the Sixteen Thirty Fund (1630), a key Arabella-affiliated group which The Atlantic described as the “indisputable heavyweight of Democratic dark money.” The Berger Action Fund alone has given over $200 million to 1630, which has in turn distributed it to hundreds of progressive organizations.
Though foreign nationals are barred from directly supporting candidates or super PACs, Wyss’ groups have exploited a loophole that allows foreign money to finance state ballot initiatives, according to APT. Namely, 1630 has spent more than $130 million on ballot campaigns in 25 states, advancing policies such as late-term abortion and drug decriminalization by embedding them directly into state constitutions—where they can only be reversed by another constitutional amendment.
In Michigan, 1630 spent over $33 million, where ballot initiatives recently enshrined a right to abortion and a right to no-excuse absentee voting in the state constitution.
The group also funneled almost $13 million into Missouri, where marijuana legalization and Medicaid expansion were recently written into the state constitution through ballot initiatives.
When foreign money flows into states, it is also used to support Democratic candidates. Earlier this year, APT uncovered that 1630 gave $1 million to a “progressive communications hub” that spent $9 million boosting the Democratic candidate in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race.
Multiple states have passed legislation to stop foreign money from financing local ballot campaigns. Even though red states have taken the lead, Janae Stracke, Vice President of Outreach and Advocacy at Heritage Action for America, said the interest in this issue has been bi-partisan.
Five states have already passed bans — Kansas, Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, and Wyoming — and several others have similar bills currently moving through their legislatures. Stracke expects more to follow.
Republican Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon signed one of these bans, House Bill 0337 into law March.
“This bill, a key plank of our conservative election integrity agenda, is a landmark piece of legislation and pivotal to ensuring foreign nationals are banned from meddling in Wyoming elections,” Wyoming Secretary of State’s Office wrote on X after Gordon signed the legislation.
“Foreign money in state ballot initiatives thwarts the American voice,” Stracke said. “This is an 80/20 issue.”
Even though the foreign funding loophole has been exploited primarily by billionaire activists, millions of dollars from Chinese entities have gone to groups promoting progressive climate policies.
Why would anyone oppose this legislation?
“It’s the money,” Stracke said.
When reached for comment, a representative for the Wyss Foundation confirmed the Berger Action Fund contributes to 1630 but declined to say if Wyss supports legislation that bans foreign funding of state ballot initiatives.
Why won’t he spend money to make Switzerland a better place to live for all citizens, not just the Muslim invaders.
Physician, heal thyself!
You said:
“It should be against the law for any foreigner
to donate money to US political causes.”
The excerpt you posted says:
“Foreign nationals are prohibited from contributing
to candidates or PACs under federal law.”
Absolutely.
As wealthy as this America-hater is, never forget that USAID burned through his wealth of $5B roughly every 6 weeks.
. . . And I'm sure the Chi-Coms mean us well and hope we prosper from such policies, right?
Let's just say that if your nation's most flagrantly active, mortal enemy is for something on your behalf (such as tree-hugging), you should ask yourself why.
Apparently it’s not enforced so there is no law..............
Why is it that every billionaire thinks he or she knows better that we do how to run our lives................
Have a black ops team pick him up and drop him off at CECOT.
George Soros is 94 years old.
Hansjörg Wyss is 89 years old.
I’ll leave it there.
The article describes how they circumvent the law.
I used to think that ‘James Bond Villains’ were so silly, over the top. But it seems like there a lot of them in the real world outside of spy fiction.
I'd just drop him off over the open ocean.
Only the good die young.................
Well ... it is a long flight from Switzerland.
Theyd find a way. Theyd buy citizenship. Theyd start an intl nonprofit and have a us office.
Dunno if they always think that. They just have money to do what they want to do and push for, regardless if it helps others or not, or if it is better for other or not.
I don't know anything about Wyss.
There has to be a motivating factor. You don’t throw $800 Million away just to see what happens...............
Dunning-kruger.
They are an expert where they made their money, so they think they are experts everywhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.