So they suddenly discovered that ONE HUNDRED employees were engaged in fraud because Trump took office? YES.
Would they have suddenly discovered that ONE HUNDRED employees were engaged in fraud had Kamala taken office? NO, it would be ignored.
Your “argument” makes no sense.
The Federal Housing and Finance Agency has released a public statement highlighting an internal review and investigation of conduct within Fannie Mae that has resulted in the termination of over 100 employees for “unethical conduct” including the “facilitation of fraud.”
The phrase "internal review" indicates that the fraud was discovered by the Federal Housing Administration, not DOGE.
They knew DOGE would uncover it so they preempted DOGE to cover their hind ends.
Please, tell me what part of my "argument" does not make sense.
When do we get the demographics on the exactly 100 people?