“Because judges hold people in contempt of court”
Understood though my argument means that we have another judge saying Trump is OK to do what he is doing, so even if the former judge claims contempt, the other pro trump judge can claim the opposite, and could even claim to hold that former judge in contempt
Judges can’t rule without a case in front of them. The cases are filed by those who are against Trump’s policies. To get a case in front of a non-liberal judge you’d have to have somebody file suit in a different court saying they are harmed by the Trump administration obeying the other judge’s order. But it takes time to file those lawsuits, and by the time that was done an appeals court will most likely hear the original case anyway.