Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neil Gorsuch's Former Law Clerk Cooks Judge Who's Screwing Around With Trump's Deportation Flights
Townhall ^ | March 25, 2025 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 03/25/2025 5:46:47 AM PDT by Red Badger

Well, Attorney General Pam Bondi isn’t going to discuss further the details regarding the deportation flights of Tren de Aragua members, a Venezuelan gang that the Trump administration has designated a foreign terror group. Judge James Boasberg, however, wanted to know the classified details regarding this operation. No, sir. This will not happen, as the Justice Department informed the courts that they’re invoking the State Secrets Act.

Move on, little man.

It still doesn’t negate the days of judicial overreach and insanity from Boasberg, who thought he was the executive, or at least in charge of deportation policy. He is not,andd never will be. He dabbled in the Russian collusion hoax, ran legal interference for those caught fabricating evidence to secure illegal FISA warrants. This man is a disgrace to the bench. Before Ms. Bondi invokes the state secrets provision, Boasberg insisted that those marked for deportation should be afforded court dates. Mike Davis, a former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, took a hatchet to little Boasberg, arguing that it’s time to impeach for his serial incidents of judicial overreach:

Recommended

Dems Face Electoral Doomsday If Nothing Changes by Census Time Matt Vespa Here is the fatal flaw with DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg's order:

Even if these designated foreign terrorists are entitled to individual court review before their deportation, which is disputed, the DC court is not the proper court.

Judge Boasberg did not, and does not, have the power to do what he is purporting to do. For this reason alone, everything he is doing is lawless. But it is much worse; it is also dangerous.

Judge Boasberg ran to his courtroom to hold a Saturday hearing, even though he was not even serving as the emergency judge that weekend. (How did he get this case?) He publicly exposed an ongoing U.S. military, intelligence, and law-enforcement operation with an American ally dealing with the most vicious terrorists (Tren de Aragua) and international gang member (MS13) in the Western Hemisphere.

That public exposure put American and allied lives in grave danger.

Stunningly, Judge Boasberg even ordered the President to turn around planes full of terrorists over the Gulf of America, without knowing the fuel levels, the security footprint back in America, or other crucial operational details.

We saw the enormous security footprint in El Salvador. Why would we have had that same footprint in America, as who could have ever imagined an activist DC judge could or would order the President to return planes full of terrorists?

And not completing the mission would have humiliated and politically damaged El Salvador's president, who had hundreds of military, law-enforcement, and other officials awaiting--and who took a significant political and personal risk by agreeing to take these terrorists.

Judge Boasberg's Saturday hearing and order crossed the red line. But Judge Boasberg is doubling down by demanding details about the military operation, to which he is not entitled. Judge Boasberg says he has a security clearance, but he definitely does not have the need to know. And allowing judges to meddle in military operations like this is dangerous and unacceptable.

Foreign leaders are less likely to work with the President, if they fear an activist American judge may disclose their secrets. This harms the President’s ability to conduct foreign policy and his constitutional duty to keep us safe.

The President has a constitutional duty, as the chief executive officer and commander-in-chief, to conduct international affairs, repeal foreign invasion, and protect American lives. The President has a constitutional duty to ignore any clearly unlawful court order that imminently endangers American lives, like Judge Boasberg's orders.

Judge Boasberg is refusing to back down. So the House must move forward with impeachment proceedings for his lawless and dangerous sabotage of the President's core Article II powers.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: boasberg; judgewatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2025 5:46:47 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Trump should ignore the national overreach of these quack, far-left jurists let the judicial branch pursue it up the chain.


2 posted on 03/25/2025 6:07:21 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Burma Shave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Go pound sand, Jimbo...


3 posted on 03/25/2025 6:09:02 AM PDT by Beave Meister (Leave the gun. Take the cannoli....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I pray there is a criminal element involved with the actions of these “activist” judges. If organized, RICO babee!!


4 posted on 03/25/2025 6:20:38 AM PDT by Racketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racketeer

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4306620/posts


5 posted on 03/25/2025 6:24:11 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

delay

delay

delay

its all they have left

can a judge rule that it is tuesday and you can only deport on wednesdays so bring them back


6 posted on 03/25/2025 6:48:18 AM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Impeachment is stupid. It’s a waste of time it will never get 60 votes.

It’s not clear to me why countering lawsuits are not filed in Trump favorable venues and then you have contradictory court orders that would logically enable the administration to believe the one they want to believe and comply with the one they want to comply with.

Then just delay the progression to the Supreme Court


7 posted on 03/25/2025 6:56:15 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Yea, I don’t know why no one is doing that…


8 posted on 03/25/2025 7:13:31 AM PDT by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

BTTT


9 posted on 03/25/2025 7:20:09 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owen

“Impeachment is stupid.”

No it is not. It is not about actually removing him. It is about the trial that will expose not only his dirty laundry, but many others connected to him too.

The “many others” will set him straight before he can expose the conspiracy because he is put on trial. In fact once evidence starts to be exposed we just might get those 60 votes to get him out and shut him and the trial down before the trial drags others into it and exposes them too.


10 posted on 03/25/2025 7:20:38 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

Absurd. This is the same sort of stuff that was talked about with Clinton’s impeachment, how when the facts come out all of those Democrat minds were going to change.

No minds are going to change. It’s politics. This is all Swamp filth that will protect themselves.


11 posted on 03/25/2025 7:25:34 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Pres. Trump should pull this clowns Security Clearance.


12 posted on 03/25/2025 7:33:04 AM PDT by HP8753 (Live Free!!!! .............or don't. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

“ Judge Boasberg ran to his courtroom to hold a Saturday hearing, even though he was not even serving as the emergency judge that weekend. (How did he get this case?)”

So he assigned this case to himself, at who’s urging? Who tipped him off about the case so he could “run to his courtroom” and hijack the case?

Something is really wrong about all of this. RICO

EC


13 posted on 03/25/2025 7:44:47 AM PDT by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Con777

Absolutely...


14 posted on 03/25/2025 7:53:50 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Owen

“Impeachment is stupid. It’s a waste of time it will never get 60 votes.”

Impeachment opens the books on the judge’s criminality. Once that’s exposed, the judge can be arrested.


15 posted on 03/25/2025 7:59:21 AM PDT by sergeantdave (AI training involves stealing content from creators and not paying them a penny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Con777

Things change when the risk of real evidence might be exposed. I have been through several civil cases where they were arrogant as hell and taunting. Until the uniformed officer physically served them. Then they were right on the phone trying to settle before it even went to court.

The possibility of a trial with real evidence exposure changes minds and attitudes quick...


16 posted on 03/25/2025 8:00:19 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

“Impeachment opens the books on the judge’s criminality. Once that’s exposed, the judge can be arrested.”

Absolutely.


17 posted on 03/25/2025 8:01:17 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I shouldn't have to scan the article to find Mike Davis's name. It should have been in the headline. This kind of clickbait is self-defeating because I will not read this idiot's article I don't care what he has to say.

Learn to edit and be straightforward. Stop wasting people's time

18 posted on 03/25/2025 8:01:26 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

“Impeachment is stupid. It’s a waste of time it will never get 60 votes.”

Impeachment opens the books on the judge’s criminality. Once that’s exposed, the judge can be arrested.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Whaaa? What criminality? If there was suspicion of criminality, the FBI can investigate it. Impeachment does not decide FBI activities. There are no magic books on such a thing opened by impeachment. If there is something there, it is there for the FBI regardless of impeachment.

It’s a purely political Swamp exercise. Clinton could be investigated for years and it would not have changed the result.


19 posted on 03/25/2025 8:07:29 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Your trust in the FBI is adorable.


20 posted on 03/25/2025 8:17:30 AM PDT by sergeantdave (AI training involves stealing content from creators and not paying them a penny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson