Posted on 03/16/2025 1:22:32 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
JUST IN: Judge William Alsup declines to stay his order requiring rehiring of probationary employees at 6 federal departments, calls OPM acting chief failure to testify 'violation of this court's order.'
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Well judge!
Who is going to pay them?
You?
I’m not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The judge can pound sand.
The President alone has authority over the executive branch. Certainly not some judge.
Friggin Satanic piece of meat with two eyes. This bastard doesn’t have the authority to pull this faggot, Aunt Teefah crap.
Well, looks like we’re coming up on the ‘take the bull by the horns’ moment. Might as well get it over with. And even though there are lots of Never Trumper RINOs in the house, I just don’t really think Trump is actually going to be removed from office. Popcorn time for sure though.
Judge Alsup? I guess we need to start calling him President Alsup since he’s usurping the function of head of the executive branch.
No wonder government jobs are so sought after, once you get hired—you have a job for life, with a pension not available to the private sector anymore, guaranteed annual cost of living pay increases, and job security the average person can only dream of!
Not under the newly weaponized Federal Judge Corps.
Yup. The little judges and the President are now going to butt heads. Force the Supreme Court to step in and make a sweeping decision.
Note that Mississipi v. Johnson (1867) already decided that the judicial branch has no power over how the Executive runs the Executive Branch. The Supreme Court today needs to re-affirm this. If they don’t, then we have a serious Constitutional Crisis. And if we get to that point, Trump will win and the Supremes will look foolish.
Waaahhhh!
this judge claims he has diligently examined the facts
and circumstances of all the federal employees’ performances.
his homes and pensions should be taken and held in balance,
in case he has not done that.
If during WWII we would have had judges of the type we have now , they’d have probably tried to stop D-Day.
“This court” can go to hell.
Tar and feather.
There is not even a pretense of law in these orders from the Courts.
To Hell with these judges. No further compliances. Get the Supreme Court to stop this overreach by District Courts or we can just scrap the entire system.
If that brings us to Dictator Trump, then so be it. The Democrats have destroyed the rule of law. They will find no further protection from it. Neither will the rest of us.
A Republic. It was nice while it lasted.
“...the Supremes will look foolish....”
Traitor Roberts and his apparent hand-maiden, Amy Conehead, already ARE foolish.
Detailed background on these cases:
the proper forum for such disputes is the Merit Systems Protection Board.
The reason it was created was to keep such disputes over federal personnel policy out of the courts.
It has resolved many thousands of such disputes over decades.
The leftists decided to skip over proper administrative procedure—and they found a judge who was good with that.
This is why the case is stupid and will fail.
Here is an article from the Los Angeles Times that explains the process:
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-03-13/legal-rights-federal-employees-complaints
Key quotes:
“Four federal judges in recent weeks have tossed out large lawsuits brought by unions and others representing federal employees, saying the courts lack power to block layoffs”
“The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 created an administrative agency inside the government to hear complaints from federal workers who say they have been wrongly demoted or discharged. And the Supreme Court said this agency provides the “exclusive forum” to decide those claims, not an independent federal court.”
“Citing that procedural rule, four federal judges in recent weeks have tossed out large lawsuits brought by unions and others representing employees.
Judges voiced regret but said they “lacked subject matter jurisdiction” to hear the complaints or to rule on the legality of the firings.”
“But judges are “duty-bound to decide legal issues based on even-handed application of law and precedent — no matter the identity of the litigants”
This one wackadoodle judge ignored decades of precedent and four other judge’s rulings in the past month.
This judge has committed gross judicial misconduct.
“There is not even a pretense of law in these orders from the Courts.”
You are not wrong.
See post 18—the judge’s opinion of employee performance is laughably irrelevant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.