Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The cancer of bureaucracy: how it will destroy science, medicine, education; and eventually everything else
Pub Med ^ | 2010 Jan 13 | Bruce G Charlton

Posted on 03/08/2025 3:04:21 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
I just said this on another thread: https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4303039/posts?page=10#10

"The need for NATO ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall. It should have been dissolved then, but bureaucracies never die, they just mutate and metastasize."

I then stumbled upon the article above and it seemed quite relevant.

A big symptom is the collapse of "peer review."

So much for ‘peer review’ — Wiley shuts down 19 science journals and retracts 11,000 gobbledygook papers

Flood of Fake Science Forces Multiple Journal Closure

1 posted on 03/08/2025 3:04:21 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Peer review is a great way to strangle scientific progress.

All great new ideas are crushed.


2 posted on 03/08/2025 3:12:08 PM PST by cgbg (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Key points at the very end...
...modernizing societies will themselves be destroyed by sclerosis, resource misallocation, incorrigibly-wrong decisions and the distortions of 'bureaucratic reality'. However, unfortunately, social collapse is the more probable outcome, since parasites can evolve more rapidly than host immune systems.

3 posted on 03/08/2025 3:17:36 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (Democrats who say ‘no one is above the law’ won’t mind going to prison for the money they stole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Half of our people are below average.


4 posted on 03/08/2025 3:18:49 PM PST by ComputerGuy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bkmk


5 posted on 03/08/2025 3:21:32 PM PST by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Try being a product development engineer in aerospace or medicine.

We would never fly and doctors would still be letting blood with leaches had the current regulatory environment been in place in the early 1900s.


6 posted on 03/08/2025 3:30:04 PM PST by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Sounds like this author could be cribbing from Von Mises’ book on this very subject from 80 years ago.

Bureaucracy, by Ludwig von Mises, 1944

https://cdn.mises.org/Bureaucracy_3.pdf

“Mises describes bureaucracies as both self-interested and economically irrational. There is no reinventing government: if we are to have government do things for us, bureaucracies, which cannot behave efficiently, will have to do the work. This small book has grown in stature as Western economies have become more and more bureaucratized.”


7 posted on 03/08/2025 3:47:20 PM PST by Pelham (President Eisenhower. Operation Wetback 1953-54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“safe and effective”...


8 posted on 03/08/2025 3:49:16 PM PST by heavy metal (maga... make asylums great again...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

Far too many.


9 posted on 03/08/2025 4:01:28 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I really like the change in attitude / perspective.

This is good stuff.

IMHO a consequence of Trump.


10 posted on 03/08/2025 4:10:17 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I have a former ‘colleague’ and scientific collaborator who very often was able to have his friends review his submitted papers and grants. He also had friends in the funding agencies. His science was not great, and I can't think of a single thing he did that truly changed his field, but he stayed perpetually funded. He actually at one point had someone he was hiring reviewing one of his grants.

The longer I spend time in this world the more apparent it is to me that the secular world favors those unencumbered by ethics, and those who parasitize - not create.

11 posted on 03/08/2025 4:10:42 PM PST by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It just keeps growing.

You have to kill it.


12 posted on 03/08/2025 4:23:03 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
From Eisenhower's farewell address:

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

As for peer review, it was originally a chance for other scientists to duplicate the work. How often is a the work behind the paper duplicated now?
13 posted on 03/08/2025 5:04:07 PM PST by KarlInOhio (“Forget it, Jake. It's California.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

ping


14 posted on 03/08/2025 5:15:21 PM PST by Taxman (MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! SUPPORT THE FAIRTAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Yet...we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

Such as "Climate Change."

15 posted on 03/08/2025 5:53:44 PM PST by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There are people who do, and those who say no. When the people who say no are in charge, nothing can get done.


16 posted on 03/08/2025 6:11:45 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

In some ways the article misses a key point. One of the things that drives bureaucratization is the need to spread the responsibility for decision making. Spread it so thin so no one person can be blamed if it’s the wrong decision. One of the driving favors in this is fear of being sued. This comes from the over “lawyerfication” of our society. We’ve spent decades and decades graduated more lawyers than we need. We organizations whose whole purpose is a class action suit! So is it anyone everything business or government responds with bureaucracy!


17 posted on 03/08/2025 6:25:46 PM PST by Reily (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Very good point.


18 posted on 03/08/2025 6:34:07 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; All

Let me re-write I found some typos I need to correct for clarities sake.

In some ways the article misses a key point. One of the things that drives bureaucratization is the need to spread the responsibility for decision making. Spread it so thin no one person can be blamed if it’s the wrong decision. One of the driving forces in this is fear of being sued. This comes from the over “lawyerfication” of our society. We’ve spent decades and decades graduating more lawyers than we need. We have organizations whose whole purpose is a class action suit! So is it any wonder every business or government organization responds with bureaucracy!


19 posted on 03/08/2025 6:43:03 PM PST by Reily (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Tell us again what you propose to replace “bureaucracy”.


20 posted on 03/08/2025 9:09:52 PM PST by KrisKrinkle (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson