The First Amendment and the Second Amendment are fundamentally the same, from a legal standpoint. Do state governments take away anyone’s right to free speech or religious worship for any reason? Would any court shut that down instantly? They sure would. But firearms? I guess you can infringe that right in about a million ways. No big deal.
Kaul will have egg on his face.
Deserved.
Regardless, if he "did the time", he shouldn't have to keep paying for the crime. IMO. Give the guy his CCL.
You want real criminals? Threats to society? Walk the halls of Congress. We've got real threats about which to worry and it's not some guy who ate a mushroom.
I agree, the peyote possession is not a dangerous criminal offense. I bet the jackasses that believe it is are high on cocaine or Mary Jane all the time. This has nothing to do with this guy’s peyote and everything to do with obstructing his 2A rights.
“”Delivery of peyote” is not a violent crime.”
If it’s overpriced, shiiitey, moldy Buttons in a plastic bag, it dang sure oughta be!
It’s blatantly obvious that Wisconsin’s AG thinks that his denial of this firearm permit violates Rahimi. Otherwise he would not have falsely deemed drug trafficking to be a violent crime.