Posted on 02/09/2025 9:57:30 AM PST by RicocheT
Now that President Trump is back in the White House, it’s time to take a victory lap and remind every smug liberal that their so-called “34-time convicted felon” narrative was always a sham. We knew it. You knew it. And now, with the truth coming to light, even some of them are starting to wake up.
Because here’s the reality: That entire case was a disgraceful political hit job, and the most blatant abuse of the justice system we’ve ever seen. The Biden DOJ never even bothered to hide their corruption. They weaponized the courts like a banana republic, hoping to kneecap Trump before the election. Spoiler alert: It failed spectacularly.
The “Crime” That Wasn’t a Crime Let’s break this down so even your most TDS-ridden cousin at Thanksgiving can understand it:
Trump was hit with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records—which, by the way, is a misdemeanor. The statute of limitations on a misdemeanor in New York? One year. So how did Alvin Bragg upgrade this to a felony? Well, in legal gymnastics that would make Simone Biles jealous, they claimed Trump falsified records to cover up another crime.
What was the other crime? No one knows! The indictment didn’t say, the judge didn’t specify, and the jury was handed a grab bag of possibilities, like some twisted legal lottery.
The jury wasn’t even required to agree on what this “other crime” was. One juror could think it was election fraud, another could believe it was a tax violation, and another could claim Trump’s hair is a crime against humanity. It didn’t matter.
The Statute of Limitations Trick Even with this legal charade, the prosecution had a problem: The case was still outside the statute of limitations.
But fear not! The deep state had a trick up its sleeve. They used a court ruling from Harvey Weinstein’s appeal (yes, THAT Harvey Weinstein) which said time spent out of state could “pause” the statute of limitations.
Trump, being the former leader of the free world, traveled frequently. So they decided that because Trump was… you know… doing his job, his statute of limitations clock should be stopped.
Yeah, that sounds fair.
Let’s be clear: Trump was never told what crime he was supposedly covering up until AFTER the trial.
Think about that.
How do you mount a defense against an unknown crime? That’s not justice. That’s a third-world dictatorship.
But the jury? They weren’t troubled by such pesky details. They were handed a list of three possible crimes—one state election law violation, one federal election law violation, and a tax issue—and told they didn’t even have to agree on which one Trump “covered up.”
Meaning? We don’t even know what crime Trump was actually convicted of!
This isn’t just a sham trial. This is a historic disgrace.
Let’s not forget:
Hillary Clinton literally had a secret server in her basement, deleting 30,000 emails AFTER they were subpoenaed. No charges.
Hunter Biden has been caught in more shady foreign dealings than a Bond villain. Slap on the wrist.
Joe Biden himself was caught with classified documents next to his vintage Corvette—which, by the way, was NOT protected by Secret Service. Nothing happened.
Meanwhile, Trump writes a check to his lawyer and suddenly he’s a felon? Give me a break.
I don’t have any friends like that.
PING felon
No one is going to listen to all that. They use the “convicted felon” trope to shut down your argument. I just laugh at them and admonish them to do better. That prompts them to inquire about your position. Then you can ‘splain it to them.
I would never allow a democrat to screech at me; I’d walk away.
Why? They won’t read anything that doesn’t confirm their bias.
bookmark
won’t do any good to send it to them- they can’t read
“Hitting” somebody with all that will fall on deaf ears. Great points but too complicated for a liberal to comprehend.
Correct. They live in an echo chamber
This is a common discussion technique which liberals use to shut down argument.
This reminds me of how if you question anything about all this LGBT stuff, you are said to be bigoted, and then the liberal takes the morally superior stance ,that you are a bigot. And thus not worthy of discussion.
If you oppose aaffirmative action, you are said to be a racist, and then the discussion ends.
If you oppose abortion on demand, you are said to be sexist and you want women impaled on coat hangers. Again, the discussion ends because the liberal does not deem you worthy of discussing the issue.
If you oppose all this global warming business, you are in favor of despoiling the environment. And you want people to die in a polluted environment. And again, you are deemed to be so reprehensible for having such views , that you’re not worthy of being on the same discussion level as the liberals.
You are right, laughing at them is about the only thing they seem to register. You cannot have a rational discussion with an irrational person. If they can’t grasp what bathroom to use or that genders cannot be changed, how do you get them to understand anything of substance? It’s about as productive as explaining astrophysics to a squirrel.
Ahem. I see the problem.
I like reminding them that Ghandi, MLK,Nelson Mandela, and even Jesus were all convicted felons. It kinda takes away the sting of the phrase “convicted felon”.
I know a few people that have TDS. Basically they are crazy to begin with, so TDS just makes them worse. I hope Trump drives home the fact that all these lawsuits are done with taxpayer money. The evil people that start these suits on both sides don’t have any skin in the game. Both sides make money (taxpayers money) and they don’t really care who wins the lawsuits.
Schiffty already got a pardon for his crimes. What crimes?
Most likely they also had Bush Derangement Syndrome and Reagan Derangement Syndrome, and Nixon Derangement Syndrome.
Indeed. Why waste time arguing with dishonest morons?
When encountering anyone who makes a public effort to support the causes that lost the last election, or merely opposes the evolving results of that election, you can always politely point out that their activism helped get DJT elected.🤯
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.