Posted on 02/05/2025 8:56:08 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Judge is skating close to suborning corruption.
Considering what has already been found, impeding lawful investigation is a no no.
I would absolutely disobey that Judge, and I would tell her so.
If they think they are going to use a pet corrupt judge to stop the evidence collecting, they can go to h3ll.
There must be some serious corruption going on there!
Can’t. Not the judge’s business. Pretty sure someone in this administration will block the judge.
Just ignore the partisan judges. What are they gonna do about it?
Appears to be another act of Rat desperation.
You have ZERO backing from the DOJ now.
So, DOGE will have to bring in department staffers (or cross-department staffers) for interviews/training and then assignments (and follow up reviews) to do department-wide audits? Congress can certainly haul in these department staffers to report their findings and answer questions. An injunction would just slow down the DOGE work.
I think Leon will handle this person.
They are acting on and under the direct orders of the President of the United States. Get out of the way or get arrested.
Seems like about time that the ‘Just-us’ be subject to a full audit of her financial records going back to 2000.
She’s trying to protect the hive. DOGE struck a direct blow.
The DOGE crew have just been given high level security clearances...so there’s that!
So the president who is the head of all the federal agencies in the executive branch and is ultimately responsible for their operations is forbidden to look at the records of his own agencies?
Being intimitely aware of what goes on there should be his number one job.
Government unions are allowed by Executive Order (John Kennedy) and said order can be revoked, thus eviscerating said unions.
Will the imperious DC judge then rule that the President has no right to revoke an EO? In the case of C C-K, she probably would.
The woman crossed over into never never land. She can’t decide what the President can and can’t see in the Executive Branch.
Shades of Vindman.
Interesting. Looking into people’s tax records without probable cause would seem a privacy violation, yet the IRS audits people’s records all the time and that’s ok because it’s a ‘random’ selection process? What do folks think of this? I think as federal employees, you could argue you lose some privacy rights where it comes the people’s money and honestly billing your time. You lose certain rights in the military. Would there not be an analogous expectation for government workers?
“Trump is obviously going to run the social security numbers of federal employees against IRS data to see how many of them have used their “work at home” status over the last four years to take on a second W-2-generating job.”
I that is a fair assessement. You have a judge saying that the government cannot be audited and be held accountable by the people. Its oligarchy
Live by the sword…
Those who will be investigated, absolutely adore, big government and the IRS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.