Pay Attention to Any New Surveillance Cameras While Driving – Breakthrough Technology Could Be Targeting You

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 1//4/2025 | C. Douglas Golden, The Western Journal

[bitt]

P

[SamuraiScot]

Sounds unconstitutional, since it's used even when no crime has been committed, or even alleged: Illegal search and seizure.

[Qwapisking]

now if it could only detect “driving while stupid”.

[bobbo666]

I wonder if one of the higher powered green lasers would burn them out.

[SharpRightTurn]

Big Brother gets bigger and more intrusive.

[Blue Highway]

And yet they won’t help if you are involved in a hit and run accident to find the driver that fled the scene. “Sorry, the cameras are run by AI, and they were monitoring grandma jaywalking across the street”

[PghBaldy]

allowing them to stop drivers before violations occur

[Blood of Tyrants]

If you get a “ticket” from a traffic camera in Tennessee, just throw the notice in the trash. It isn’t a real ticket and cannot affect your driving record and isn’t even sent out by the police. It’s sent out by a private company that made a deal with the mayor or city council telling them they will get them a lot of money from the traffic cam.

[OHPatriot]

A friend wants to know if they are bullet proof and to what caliber?

[PghBaldy]

The stupid courts will say there is no expectation of privacy in public.

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

If you get a “ticket” from a traffic camera in Tennessee, just throw the notice in the trash. It isn’t a real ticket and cannot affect your driving record and isn’t even sent out by the police. It’s sent out by a private company that made a deal with the mayor or city council telling them they will get them a lot of money from the traffic cam.

Same is true everywhere else.

If the traffic cam ticket does not include contact information for the court system where you can go to contest the ticket, it's a fake ticket.

[DugwayDuke]

From the article: “Instead, they look for violations, like failure to wear a seat belt or texting while driving.”

Both of which are violations of traffic laws. They should also look for using cell phones while holding them in your hands.

[BenLurkin]

[I want the USA back]

So it starts. Using AI to monitor and control people. This will result in many false positives, where the angle of the shot, the lighting, reflections off the windshield and shadows will combine to produce something that is interpreted as a violation.

Then try to prove the computer was wrong.

[Brian Griffin]

The Chinese and Russians will simply arrange for Joe’s two-legged, light-fingered imports to steal the cameras and take the chips out of them for use in Chinese and Russian weapons.

[NorthMountain]

sends images to nearby police officers, allowing them to stop drivers before violations occur,

And here we have an example of "AI" technology already being abused.

It will be abused, because it CAN be abused.

[SamuraiScot]

The stupid courts will say there is no expectation of privacy in public.

Intercepting your communications devices?

Speculation on places you might be expected to speed--when you're not currently speeding--and sending a cop to catch you (hoping against hope) or claim that he did?

[NorthMountain]

Yeah, buddy! Let's put AI powered cameras everywhere, including your bathroom ... you might be violating some law that you don't even know exists ... but the AI does.

We can't tolerate scofflaws, after all.

[Doctor Congo]

People drinking a soda while they drive will be pulled over for possible DUI.
The camera was certain it was a beer. Grounds for defamation.