Posted on 12/28/2024 6:13:31 PM PST by iontheball
In my first post in this series, I introduced the topic of chlorine dioxide as a therapeutic within its “political” context, not scientific. After a cursory introduction regarding its safety along with a few citations of its efficacy, I highlighted the regulatory, media, and judicial attacks against any who manufacture, recommend and/or sell chlorine dioxide for medicinal purposes via oral ingestion.
A key point I brought attention to is the bizarre prohibition against “oral ingestion” that “they” are trying to block at all costs (despite studies of both oral and IV administration showing little to no toxicity and the fact that there are numerous products already on the market for oral and/or dental applications).
In this post, I will share what I recently learned of what happened in Bolivia around chlorine dioxide. I think it is a story the world needs to hear. Again, these are the first of a series of posts on chlorine dioxide with later ones going into the data on safety and efficacy as well as treatment approaches for various conditions. If you don’t want to miss the rest of the series, I suggest you subscribe now:
(Excerpt) Read more at pierrekorymedicalmusings.com ...
I skimmed the entire article but could find nothing about what chlorine dioxide treats?
Is it used to treat COVID-1984?
Yes, as stated in the article ;-)
It is a totally incoherent article that does not have a beginning or end. It’s all middle.
In practice, there is no country, at least in our hemisphere, where it is legally authorized, because there is no scientific evidence, there is no evidence to demonstrate its preventive or curative properties, its promoters resort to testimonies from people, supposedly treated, and the testimonies have no scientific validity if the product is not supported by controlled clinical studies that demonstrate its effectiveness in the sense that it has curative properties and demonstrate its safety and that it does not produce adverse reactions.This could be stated equally of the jabs as it is intended for Chlorine Dioxide.
Looks like one of its uses is to make potable water when you are camping in the wilderness.
It sounds like you could drink water treated with it to get the COVID-1984 fighting effect.
It is a totally incoherent article with information scattered around like confetti.
I know oxides of chlorine have powerful antimicrobial activities and are used as
cleaning agents for food factories. We all know how it's used in water purification.
But as a medicine???
Proponents claim it has antimicrobial properties and can treat various conditions.
I used to have these lesions in my mouth every month or every couple of months. That type of lesion would appear repeatedly. I received treatment from various doctors, and I even traveled to the United States to a center because they told me it could be lichen planus, coxsackie, a herpes mutation, and so on. I received many diagnoses, but nothing improved. I used balsiclovir, I tried many vitamins to boost my immunity. They wanted to perform a biopsy, and that’s when I discovered chlorine dioxide. I started taking chlorine dioxide, did a liver cleanse, and since then, I’ve never had those lesions again
During the COVID-19 pandemic, she applied chlorine dioxide for hospital disinfection and in patients without access to hospitals,
I believe there currently exists a “wealth of evidence” of its safety and effectiveness against a broad array of microbes including viruses, bacteria (even multi-drug resistant), parasites, and fungi. Its efficacy in a broad range of non-infectious diseases also appears promising and I will be sharing evidence of that in future posts.
Ah yes. Trust a marxist revolutionary communist regime.
I vote no thanks.
https://clordisys.com/pdfs/sds/SDS%20-%20Chlorine%20Dioxide%20Gas.pdf
Does the medical establishment recommend chlorine dioxide?
Oh wait a minute...never mind.
Tylenol is fatal if inhaled and toxic if swallowed.
It all depends on the dose and the means of ingestion.
Our purpose is to think carefully.
hear, hear.
That's why I won't inhale or swallow a powerful oxidizing agent like ClO2
I’ve only scratched the surface of Chlorine Dioxide.
Most importantly, its reactivity is VERY different from Chlorine, particularly in that it does not produce trihalomethanes. Significantly, it is not a halogen like elemental chlorine.
Without looking, I’m sure that it’s more expensive than chlorine for municipal water treatment.
Gonna do more research tomorrow. Anything notable I’ll post back here.
Maybe Kamala’s speech writer wrote the article. Space laugh space laugh even more space laugh laugh laugh laugh.walk away from podium. laugh again on the way out
Hazardous Decomposition Products: Chlorine (Cl2), oxygen (O2), and hydrochloric acid (HCl)
What happens when you dilute a strong oxidizing agent?
So Trump was RIGHT! As usual.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.