They're Using the Kavanaugh Playbook on Pete Hegseth

X/Twitter.com ^ | 11:12 AM · Dec 7, 2024 | The Patriots Gazette / Citizen Free Press @CitizenFreePres

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Scott Jennings deserves a medal for dealing with CNN bootlickers.

[xp38]

I don’t think Hegseth is a pet. Pete maybe but not pet.

[V_TWIN]

I don’t see Hegseth openly weeping like Kavanaugh did

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Typos are the important thing.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

To be fair, I believe Kavanaugh has conducted a far morally superior life than Pete Hegseth or even Trump for that matter. Hegseth has been married three times.

(THIS IS NOT DISQUALIFYING FOR DOD I’m just saying.) Kavanaugh you can tell has led a more upright, skeleton-less life.

[null and void]

Typos are the impotent thing.

[HYPOCRACY]

I also doubt Hegseth would be a wishy washy Roberts clone like whiny Kavanaugh.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

Kavanaugh has objectively led an upstanding moral, personal life as an adult. And I’m not even saying the skeletons in Hegseth’s closet are grounds for what he’s dealing with — only that the accusations against Kavanaugh were so beyond patently false given who he actually is. It’s no wonder he wept.

[HonorInPa]

Commas save lives. “Let’s eat Gramma” or “Let’s eat, Gramma”.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

I feel terrible for what happened to Kavanugh’s good name after the Blasey Ford fiasco. He does not deserve the burden of that baggage.

[blackdog]

https://imgflip.com/i/2i3391

[E. Pluribus Unum]

[VTenigma]

No, they’re using the Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas playbook on Pete.

[Brian Griffin]

Hopefully, Senators Thune, Cornyn, Collins, Murkowski and Ernst will allow Pete and the woman of concern to have their say, under oath and penalty of perjury.

Pete is clearly a brave, fluent and capable person.

Will the woman match Pete’s bravery?

Can the woman match Pete’s bravery?

[HYPOCRACY]

He’s a squish who leans left because he got harassed. That fiasco was so false it was almost laughable that anyone would believe that skank. The guy never should have been nominated. His history showed he was another panderer like the guy he was replacing. His only female clerk policy was a massive tell.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

[Fiji Hill]

These tactics are old. In 1959 the Democrats carried out a successful smear campaign against Lewis Strauss, President Eisenhower's choice for Secretary of Commerce. A decade later, they did the same thing to Clement Haynsworth, a Southern conservative that President Nixon wanted on the Supreme Court (Harry Blackmun, author of Roe vs. Wade eventually got the job). In 1987, it was Robert Bork's turn to be the victim of a Democrat smear job.

[wildcard_redneck]

"Kavanaugh has objectively led an upstanding moral, personal life as an adult. And I'm not even saying the skeletons in Hegseth’s closet are grounds for what he's dealing with — only that the accusations against Kavanaugh were so beyond patently false given who he actually is. It's no wonder he wept."

This is no judgment against Kavenaugh but I prefer Hegseth. When I want a hammer I don't care if it has a slightly off color personal life, I want it to pound nails down.

[Just mythoughts]

WOW look at the self righteous hypocrites ... Judge NOT lest ye be judge ... course now your big pappy applied this scripture to the queers ...

GOD will judge ... King David was called a man after God's own heart ... King David never played the i am holy role. And NOBODY every called King David ‘father’ this or ‘holy father’ that ... clear out your own skeletons..

Kavanaugh has been a piss poor justice .. WE the people wasted a lot of time and treasure to get him a ‘supreme’ seat over US.

[datricker]

If the New York times, Washington Post, msnbc,cnn, LA times etc says something about Trump or anything related to him, such as cabnet nominees, it’s almost certainty a lie. As such people have stopped caring about their take. It makes me like pete more