Posted on 11/06/2024 10:32:19 AM PST by Starman417
Donald Trump has won the race for President, taking not only the Electoral College, but the popular vote as well. There is no overstating what happened last night. It is the most remarkable moment in the political history of this country. Not only does it put Trump back in the White House, but it has also revealed something else that has been in dire need of exposure- the election fraud of 2020.
Naturally, liberals are stinging from this loss, some more than others.
One left winger noticed something
Indeed, but the obvious escaped her. There were about 61 million democrat votes cast in the 2012, 2016 and 2024 elections. There was an outlier- 2020. In 2020 somehow 81 million votes were cast for a guy who never left the basement.
To which Jeff Carlson replied
2020 Biden: 81 million votes Trump: 74 million votesdemocrat candidates got 62 million in 2012, 65 million in 2016 and 66 million in 2024. Biden "got" 81 million in 2020.2024 Trump: 71 million votes Harris: 66 million votes
These numbers show that the 2020 election was an organized theft by the Left. That’s what they show.
And there it is. Here's Steve Bannon
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net ...
I can’t wait to interpolate the 2024 county results into my Obama 2008 Vote Fraud Detection tool spreadsheets.
It’s gonna be EPIC!! :)
I can’t wait to interpolate the 2024 county results into my Obama 2008 Vote Fraud Detection tool spreadsheets.
It’s gonna be EPIC!! :)
By the time all California votes are added and remaining votes from all other states are also included I believe that Trump will have 78 million votes to Harris’s 75 million. That gives Trump a 2% edge over Harris. However, compared to 2020 there still is a shortage of votes in 2024 compared to 2020. This shortage is in spite of population growth, easier vote by mail accessibility, and massive voter intensity on both sides.
It is entirely logical to doubt the integrity of the 2020 count. I’m looking forward to a logical explanation.
Any more of this and I’ll be very close to an overdose of schadenfreude.
Wow. I appreciate that you are going to make the comparison on a county by county basis. That will definitely show where the fraud hotspots are.
Ping me when you do it so I do not miss it.
“hese numbers show that the 2020 election was an organized theft by the Left.”
Well...not really. If they stole 2020, why did they not steal 2024? Hm???
What’s worse than a stolen election is the fact that they colluded with China to release a virus on the planet in order to steal the 2020 election.
If you recall, they had nothing, zero to run on after Trumps first term. Record employment, low food and fuel prices. Jobs for everyone who wanted to work.
They had to create a disaster to allow illegal voting methods to be accepted.
They killed many people all over the planet to enable the fraud of 2020. Those responsible should be prosecuted and held accountable for the biggest crime of this century.
popul | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-ation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
oblabya | mcstain | 2008 total | bammy | dumbney | cankles | Trump | JoeTatoe | Trump | rank | ||||||||||||||||||
Apache | 15,390 | 62% | 8,551 | 34% | 24,907 | Apache | 17,147 | 66% | 8,250 | 32% | 25,917 | Apache | 17,083 | 62% | 8,240 | 30% | 27,661 | Apache | 23,293 | 66% | 11,442 | 32% | 35,268 | 10 | |||
Cochise | 18,943 | 38% | 29,026 | 59% | 49,390 | Cochise | 18,546 | 38% | 29,497 | 60% | 49,201 | Cochise | 17,450 | 35% | 28,092 | 56% | 50,015 | Cochise | 23,732 | 39% | 35,557 | 59% | 60,665 | 8 | |||
Coconino | 31,433 | 57% | 22,186 | 40% | 54,861 | Coconino | 29,257 | 56% | 21,220 | 41% | 51,962 | Coconino | 32,404 | 54% | 21,108 | 35% | 59,784 | Coconino | 44,698 | 61% | 27,052 | 37% | 73,632 | 7 | |||
Gila | 7,884 | 35% | 14,095 | 62% | 22,717 | Gila | 7,697 | 36% | 13,455 | 62% | 21,595 | Gila | 7,003 | 31% | 14,182 | 63% | 22,515 | Gila | 8,943 | 32% | 18,377 | 66% | 27,735 | 11 | |||
Graham | 3,487 | 29% | 8,376 | 69% | 12,170 | Graham | 3,609 | 30% | 8,076 | 68% | 11,905 | Graham | 3,301 | 27% | 8,025 | 65% | 12,281 | Graham | 4,034 | 27% | 10,749 | 72% | 15,029 | 13 | |||
Greenlee | 1,165 | 39% | 1,712 | 58% | 2,968 | Greenlee | 1,310 | 44% | 1,592 | 53% | 2,986 | Greenlee | 1,092 | 33% | 1,892 | 57% | 3,300 | Greenlee | 1,182 | 32% | 2,433 | 66% | 3,696 | 15 | |||
La Paz | 1,929 | 34% | 3,509 | 62% | 5,671 | La Paz | 1,880 | 33% | 3,714 | 65% | 5,735 | La Paz | 1,575 | 26% | 4,003 | 67% | 5,951 | La Paz | 2,236 | 30% | 5,129 | 69% | 7,472 | 14 | |||
Maricopa | 602,166 | 44% | 746,448 | 54% | 1,380,571 | Maricopa | 602,288 | 44% | 749,885 | 54% | 1,380,959 | Maricopa | 702,907 | 45% | 747,361 | 48% | 1,567,834 | Maricopa | 1,040,774 | 50% | 995,665 | 48% | 2,076,086 | 1 | |||
Mohave | 22,092 | 32% | 44,333 | 64% | 68,930 | Mohave | 19,533 | 28% | 49,168 | 70% | 70,328 | Mohave | 17,455 | 22% | 58,282 | 73% | 79,943 | Mohave | 24,831 | 24% | 78,535 | 75% | 104,883 | 5 | |||
Navajo | 15,579 | 43% | 19,761 | 54% | 36,366 | Navajo | 16,945 | 45% | 19,884 | 53% | 37,465 | Navajo | 16,459 | 41% | 20,577 | 51% | 40,294 | Navajo | 23,383 | 45% | 27,657 | 53% | 51,930 | 9 | |||
Pima | 206,254 | 52% | 182,406 | 46% | 397,503 | Pima | 201,251 | 53% | 174,779 | 46% | 383,173 | Pima | 224,661 | 53% | 167,428 | 40% | 421,640 | Pima | 304,981 | 58% | 207,758 | 40% | 522,174 | 2 | |||
Pinal | 44,254 | 42% | 59,421 | 56% | 106,095 | Pinal | 44,306 | 41% | 62,079 | 57% | 108,682 | Pinal | 47,892 | 37% | 72,819 | 56% | 129,546 | Pinal | 75,106 | 40% | 107,077 | 58% | 185,525 | 3 | |||
Santa Cruz | 8,683 | 64% | 4,518 | 33% | 13,542 | Santa Cruz | 9,486 | 68% | 4,235 | 30% | 13,911 | Santa Cruz | 11,690 | 71% | 3,897 | 24% | 16,433 | Santa Cruz | 13,138 | 67% | 6,194 | 32% | 19,581 | 12 | |||
Yavapai | 36,889 | 37% | 61,192 | 61% | 100,904 | Yavapai | 33,918 | 34% | 64,468 | 64% | 100,667 | Yavapai | 35,590 | 31% | 71,330 | 62% | 114,450 | Yavapai | 49,602 | 35% | 91,527 | 64% | 143,640 | 4 | |||
Yuma | 18,559 | 42% | 24,577 | 56% | 44,256 | Yuma | 18,059 | 43% | 23,352 | 56% | 42,073 | Yuma | 24,605 | 46% | 25,165 | 47% | 53,010 | Yuma | 32,210 | 46% | 36,534 | 52% | 70,072 | 6 | |||
Total | 1,034,707 | 45% | 1,230,111 | 53% | 2,320,851 | 1,025,232 | 1,233,654 | 2,306,559 | 1,161,167 | 1,252,401 | 2,604,657 | 1,672,143 | 1,661,686 | 3,397,388 |
They had cover in 2020.
Funny how Flopping Aces is not accessible via my VPN.
This graph and the 0330 in the morning hockey stick vote counts have been known to some of us for four years now. We have been ignored and ridiculed for that long.
I would be grateful for a ping, too.
I stayed up until 3:30 last night, waiting for a sudden surge for Harris. When CNN finally called Pennsylvania for Trump, 40 minutes after another entity called it, I figured the election was over.
I wonder what stopped them from cheating this time. I wonder if they have something else up their sleeves.
I always believed that the people volunteering at the polling places (mostly) just want to do a good job. I told my mother after the 2000 Florida recounts that the best count is always the first one because the people just want to do a good job for their communities and nobody knows how many votes they need to win. Once they start recounting, partisan instincts take over when there is a known goal to attain.
For the most part, I still believe that. The old saying that all politics is local is true. However, when national parties try to take over for partisan interests, bad things happen. I think the national elites didn't count on everyone locally still stinging from the accusations in 2020 and striving to "present the image of secure elections" to bolster confidence in 2024. I think local pride in a job well-done got in the way of plans for a national cheat given all the eyes that would be on this election after 2020.
-PJ
Apparently dead and nonexistent people lost the keen interest in politics that was so remarkable in 2020.
This implies a lot extra welfare benefits needs stopping.
Trumps army of lawyers cleaned up a illegal operators for the DNC.
A turnout rate of 70% is considered high. If you find either a normal turnout rate but a huge increase in registrations, or, you find an extremely high turnout rate for Biden, that would be suspicious.
If a high number of registrations occurred, they are probably still on the rolls and could be audited to determine if they are fraudulent. That would be a telltale sign of a stolen election.
Somebody coordinated six states stopping their counts until late at night, and then boosting Biden’s numbers. They coordinated having assets in place who were willing to risk the small chance of prosecution.
This time, they didn’t boost Harris. Coordinators retired? Scared? Couldn’t place assets? Too expensive?
Did somebody get caught already, and the rest bailed out? Too many eyes, that weren’t there in the past?
Interesting how similar the numbers were in the 2008 and 2012 races with Obama and his GOP opponents.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.