Skip to comments.
JUST-IN: Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) to Formally Investigate Harris Campaign and ABC for Debate Rigging
Gateway Pundit ^
| 09/15/2024
| Jordan Conradson
Posted on 09/15/2024 12:57:09 PM PDT by DFG
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
09/15/2024 12:57:09 PM PDT
by
DFG
To: DFG
2
posted on
09/15/2024 12:57:56 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: DFG
3
posted on
09/15/2024 1:01:38 PM PDT
by
God luvs America
(6young 3.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: All
Mighty suspicious ‘earrings” Kamala wore. Almost like wireless earbud earrings.
4
posted on
09/15/2024 1:02:19 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(my latest Hollywood rejected movie script "Ghostbusters and Mrs. Muir".)
To: DFG
No crime was committed. Debates are not “national security” stuff.
5
posted on
09/15/2024 1:02:36 PM PDT
by
Vermont Lt
(Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
To: DFG
Senators don’t “formally investigate” anything - especially Senators in the minority.
6
posted on
09/15/2024 1:02:58 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: DFG
Oh good grief.
How about expending as much effort of election rigging?
7
posted on
09/15/2024 1:03:27 PM PDT
by
workerbee
(==)
To: dfwgator
Obviously you have no clue whatsoever on how to Fight! Fight! Fight!
You can stay on the sideline. The rest of us will carry the battle forward...
To: dfwgator
It will go nowhere, but the charges of election interference should not go unanswered. Especially when true. It is not Russia, Russia, Russia. It is ABC, DNC, NBC.
9
posted on
09/15/2024 1:09:12 PM PDT
by
MtnClimber
(For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
To: dfwgator
“It will go nowhere.”
___________
You’re always cynical on things like this, I’ve witnessed it myself many times. I usually hold out some hope. So far though, I have to give you credit, you’ve been right. A sad state of affairs.
10
posted on
09/15/2024 1:10:45 PM PDT
by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: DFG
It’s the media to go after, not Harris.
11
posted on
09/15/2024 1:11:46 PM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: politicket
It’s hysterical reading the whiners and Debbie downers in this thread. Isn’t this the exact sort of lawfare the rats have participated in the past 8 years while the GOP sits on the sidelines and everyone here complains?
12
posted on
09/15/2024 1:12:49 PM PDT
by
God luvs America
(6young 3.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: DFG
It is suspected that Kamala knew the questions in advance due to her out-of-the-ordinary, well-prepared responses.She did not even hesitate. It was almost like she had the lines memorized.
To: jacknhoo
It will go nowhere.
This guy is less Swamp than many, having been in DC only since 2017. But that does break the 6 year rule and he can’t be trusted.
14
posted on
09/15/2024 1:13:42 PM PDT
by
Owen
To: DFG
Is this connected to the whistleblower?
15
posted on
09/15/2024 1:13:49 PM PDT
by
philippa
To: DFG
Let me guess, there will be a letter on formal, engraved letterhead stationery.
16
posted on
09/15/2024 1:14:03 PM PDT
by
Buttons12
( )
To: Owen
Now that betting markets on politics is legal the bettors who got screwed by the cheat have grounds to sue. There is also the possibility of being prosecuted for rigging a market, kinda like rigging an NFL game.
17
posted on
09/15/2024 1:16:59 PM PDT
by
wildcard_redneck
(He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
To: DFG
Oh goody...another investigation.
18
posted on
09/15/2024 1:22:08 PM PDT
by
mass55th
(“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
To: Vermont Lt
“No crime was committed. Debates are not “national security” stuff.”
No crime is needed to remove an FCC license if it can be demonstrated that ABC is not working in the interest of the public good.
Rigging a debate with the intent of altering an election outcome would fall into that category.
19
posted on
09/15/2024 1:25:34 PM PDT
by
PTBAA
All that’s required is validation of the alleged whistleblower’s affidavit. Thereafter, it can be used as campaign material.
20
posted on
09/15/2024 1:26:21 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist! )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson