Actually, yes. Yes it would.
Acosta making it look like the media wants a presser with her. She can stay the course and they will not press the issue. She doesn’t need to do them with their providing cover.
Acosta: look, we need some content...we’ll be as nice and friendly as possible. Gosh, come on. We’ll say bad stuff about Trump. We promise.
The press ought to go negative. Let the Harris campaign know that they can get softball questions if they have a press conference. But until the press conference, the coverage will be negative.
In the normal world, that sort of approach would be obvious. But the press would never do that. And so there shall be no press conferences. And the coverage will just stay positive.
“If this anchor baby wins without doing a single public press conference or debate, this country is finished.”
Agreed.
Chicken spox
Acosta seems almost apologetic when asking as if to say, Sorry guys, you know i dont care, just gotnto appear to care. The expectations are loe because she a little girl who is delecate. It would be wrong to ask her real questions, she might cry and get her period early.
Because it means that our media is now a part of the DNC and is not being held to campaign finance requirements.
Didn’t pedo joe do the same thing?
Update!
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
This is the mentality of the US ruling class, stated as explicitly as can be: The only thing that matters is our empowerment. We have no obligation to be accountable to anyone, to explain ourselves to any of you. If we choose to do so, it’s only because it’s in our interests:
Replying to:
Michael McFaul
@McFaul
The paramount objective for @KamalaHarris is to win this election. If a press conference helps her win, she should do it. If not, she shouldn’t do it. It’s just that simple. She has no “moral obligation” to talk to the press. Tone it down folks.
>If this anchor baby wins without doing a single public press conference or debate, this country is finished.
Irrespective of who wins, I fear the markets and economy will crater in 2025. Trump may limit the carnage, but he’ll get the blame.
I have it on good authority the sit down interview will be with Elmo of sesame street.
Yes it would kill their poll numbers.
She cant speak because she might spill the beans on her REAL agenda..heck at least Hillary Clinton in 2016 told everyone what her agenda would be..people either liked it or they didnt, but damn at least she stood for something..with Harris, she stands for NOTHING, but even worse, she does stand for something, open borders, abolishing the police, abolishing private health care, but she cant say it til AFTER the wins, then she will do it and guess what, TOO DAMN LATE..Bernie Sanders endorsed her for a reason, he helped make the proposal for single payer, he would have come out and said “Hey Harris we had a deal now you are backing out” notice he has said NOTHING about her changing positions, because she hasn’t
Harris doesn’t even have any policies on her campaign.
She doesn’t want to reveal it’s the Obama and Biden agenda with full force.
If elected it’s the day liberty dies with unlimited chaos.
Look for the honeymoon period for Harris/Walz to last until the convention, then enjoy watching as the wheels start to come off.
CNN is desperately trying to regain the relevance they used to possess.
Off the subject but Stephen A Smith has extended an invitation to Trump to go on his show. He’s ranting on Kamala the cackling hyena for not doing any press conferences so he invited her to come on his show. But apparently her team has been awfully quiet about going on any show as of now. Trump better jump on the invitation before the cackling hyena goes on his show!