Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Multiple Shooters? | John Cullen & Clay Martin (TPC #1,538)
Tommy's Podcast ^ | July 30, 2024 | John Cullen

Posted on 07/30/2024 6:02:57 PM PDT by mbrfl

John Cullen may have just broken this thing wide open. He presents audio evidence of silenced sub-sonic gunfire, and visual evidence of muzzle flashes from the window of the building on which Crooks was stationed.

Additionally, he and Lee Stranahan have created a 3-D rendering of the crime scene through which, Cullen has been able to analyze trajectories with great precision.

And finally, Cullen presents a plausible theory to explain the known facts.

Major bullet points of his theory

- There was a sniper in the trees, east of Trump's podium as well as a sniper in the building below Crooks.

- Both snipers were using silenced sub-sonic weapons

- The sniper from the trees was tasked with taking out the the sniper team on the roof of the north building while the sniper in the building was tasked with taking out the sniper team on the roof of the south building

-Crooks was taken out by the sniper team on the south roof, before he even had a chance to take a shot.

-Trump was hit by the sniper from the building

Cullen also shares a picture of a possible suspect for the window shooter.

(Excerpt) Read more at rumble.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: assassination; claymartin; dayvestewart; johncullen; multishooters; nutjobs; secondshooter; thomascrooks; trump; trumpshot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 07/30/2024 6:02:57 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Multiple Shooters Ping !

See Also:

Audio Analysis is Clear…Trump & Crowd were shot by two separate People”

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4252705/posts


2 posted on 07/30/2024 6:06:43 PM PDT by Candor7 (Ask not for whom the Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!),<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

Deepstaters come along and say, “nothing to see, let’s wait for congress, trust the fbi,cia and SS” in 3…2…1…….


3 posted on 07/30/2024 6:12:06 PM PDT by ARW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

Interesting. The guy shooting at the counter-snipers was suspended 200’ in the air ...


4 posted on 07/30/2024 6:12:31 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

No... one was enough. This is retarded crap now. They do this to discredit the actual stories. This is akin to the stories that JFKs driver turned around and shot him with a pistol.
When enough absurd stories start making the rounds, the ACTUAL nefarious actors hide in the chaff.

No, there were not multiple shooters in the trees with silencers and subsonic ammo.


5 posted on 07/30/2024 6:14:55 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Allegra; humblegunner; george76; bitt; SeekAndFind

May have been three shooters Ping.


6 posted on 07/30/2024 6:17:52 PM PDT by Candor7 (Ask not for whom the Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!),<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

“Audio Analysis is Clear…Trump & Crowd were shot by two separate People””

Total garbage!!!


7 posted on 07/30/2024 6:22:27 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

Oh, no! Not this again!!


8 posted on 07/30/2024 6:25:42 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl
So, *two* snipers with better equipment (and one would expect, training/ability as well) than Crooks - and one or both of them fired at Trump but only nicked his ear? Plus, the first shots were clearly not from a suppressed firearm, and were directed at the stage, not the counter-snipers who were quite visible. Just a wee bit of confusion in this tale - but that's probably the intent.

Nope, this just doesn't quite clear the Occam's Razor hurdle for me.

9 posted on 07/30/2024 6:26:21 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

For love of God…please stop!


10 posted on 07/30/2024 6:26:40 PM PDT by oldernittany
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
This is retarded crap now. They do this to discredit the actual stories. This is akin to the stories that JFKs driver turned around and shot him with a pistol. When enough absurd stories start making the rounds, the ACTUAL nefarious actors hide in the chaff.

Bingo. This helps to obscure the security "failure" issue like a smokescreen.

11 posted on 07/30/2024 6:32:37 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
No, there were not multiple shooters in the trees with silencers and subsonic ammo.

In the video of the Trump shooting, three sets of shots can be heard: three shots at the beginning (0:08 to 0:10) which hits Trump, five or six shots in the middle (0:12 to 0:14) which are fired when Trump is down, and a single shot at the end (0:24).

Professional hits, which I believe this was, normally involve more than one hitman. It is plausible in this case that the professional hitman, who was not to be found, is responsible for the first three shots. He was supposed to kill Trump. The second gunman, Crooks on the rooftop, accounts for the middle shots. He was instructed to fire at Trump after the first gunman fired. And the final shot is the from the police sniper at Crooks, who was the designated fall guy, or patsy. This scenario fits a pattern of assassination attempts that have been used in the past.

Video shows moment of Trump assassination attempt at rally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAk6dXEzIUo

12 posted on 07/30/2024 6:56:00 PM PDT by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

>>”Nope, this just doesn’t quite clear the Occam’s Razor hurdle for me.”

That’s probably because you didn’t watch the video. All the objections you raised are addressed.


13 posted on 07/30/2024 6:56:43 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

Amazing

All these subsonic rounds going off.Even as the president is being evacuated and only three innocents were hurt or died

/S


14 posted on 07/30/2024 6:57:27 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

“That’s probably because you didn’t watch the video. All the objections you raised are addressed.”

He never addressed how one of the shooters was suspended 200’ in the air.


15 posted on 07/30/2024 7:02:05 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

“That’s probably because you didn’t watch the video. All the objections you raised are addressed.”

Three shooters. Two professionals and all missed. duh ...


16 posted on 07/30/2024 7:03:59 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
All these subsonic rounds going off.Even as the president is being evacuated and only three innocents were hurt or died

In the Trump shooting video, a total of nine or ten shots can be heard. Five different people were struck with bullets. A hit rate around 50 percent is about right.

17 posted on 07/30/2024 7:07:19 PM PDT by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

“The sniper from the trees was tasked with taking out the the sniper team on the roof of the north building while the sniper in the building was tasked with taking out the sniper team on the roof of the south building”

They depict a downward trajectory from the counter-snipers to the crowd. For this to be the shooter would have to suspended in mid-air.


18 posted on 07/30/2024 7:09:47 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

>>”No... one was enough. This is retarded crap now. They do this to discredit the actual stories.”

Or, here’s a thought. Maybe people push the lone gunman theories in order to hide what really happened. BTW, whether one gunman was enough is debatable and irrelevant in this case. The theory of multiple shooters isn’t just a response to “It had to be more than one person”. The theory Cullen offered is in response to evidence that can’t be explained by a lone gunman theory. You can ignore the evidence if you choose. But if you were open minded you would have tried to refute the evidence rather than ignore it.


19 posted on 07/30/2024 7:09:56 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

>>hey depict a downward trajectory from the counter-snipers to the crowd. For this to be the shooter would have to suspended in mid-air.

Or in a tree.


20 posted on 07/30/2024 7:11:06 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson