Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MIchaelTArchangel
>>claiming she is a private citizen…

If the subpoena is served while she is director, resigning should have no affect of the powers of the House to require her to testify.

The subpoena is for while she was/is director.

Resigning does Not absolve one crimes they have or may have committed.

76 posted on 07/20/2024 8:17:43 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Deaf Smith

We have seen this situation before. People have been issued subpoenas to federal employees to testify. Those people resigned or retired and the courts quashed the subpoenas.

You are making a classic mistake of projecting what you wish the law says rather than what is says. That is what Socialists and Communists routinely do. I am not saying you are a Socialist or a Communist, just that you are doing what they do.


87 posted on 07/20/2024 10:12:49 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: Deaf Smith

When she resigns, she will turn in her cell phone and other records. If she shows up for a hearing, she will simply say, “I can’t remember. I do not have access to the records I would need to answer that question fully and correctly.” I will be up to the House and Senate committees then to subpoena those records.


88 posted on 07/20/2024 10:41:26 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson