also, watch this: 33 min
“This Is Gonna Get Us ALL Blown Up!” Jeffrey Sachs On Russian Invasion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mULVrUGh6wo
Once again, Russian allegations with zero evidence. The weapons are not identified, nor any indication given that “NATO” supplied them.
Total crapola. Thanks for wasting everyone’s time.
priest beheaded???
sure this is not in france?
what is putin’s immigration policy anyway?
Islam needs to be banned world wide.
We know a lot of the stuff sent to Ukraine is turned into quick cash.
i.e. u.s. weapons.
“Officials Allege Terrorists Were Using NATO Supplied Weapons”
Not sure about the weapons, but this CLEARLY has all the earmarks of a NATO-run operation.
Nothing good every happens in any 'Stan. Wipe out all the 'Stans with WMDs,
and we would be well on the road to world peace.
Ukraine ping
Why would they need NATO-supplied weapons? The country has always been awash in Russian weapons. Ramzan Kadyrov, Putin’s personal bum boy, is a Chechen temporarily on loan from Chechnya’s home-grown jihadist movement. His father fought in the First Chechen War against Russia, switched sides in the Second in exchange for Putin awarding him Chechnya as his personal fief. Putin may have doubted Kadyrov Senior’s loyalty, bumped him off, paving the way for Junior to step up.
In his heart of hearts, Ramzan Kadyrov may think Putin bumped off his dad, and is perhaps biding his time. That may account for the delay in Kadyrov declaring his allegiance to Putin after Prigozhin announced his march on Moscow. Bottom line is that there are tens of millions of restive Muslims in Russia, including a number of leaders on a short leash who may see the diversion of resources to Ukraine as the daylight they need to mount a bid to rid themselves of the Russian yoke.
NATO weapons. Abandoned in afghanistan perhaps?
There isn’t anything the Biden regime and NATO aren’t capable of at the present time.
And that's how we know Russian authorities are lying. They include specific details that accomplish two goals. Give the appearance that the Russian government is on top of the situation (despite that if they were, it would not have happened). The second goal is lay blame (away from their own ineptitude).
If the US and NATO were behind this, they would go for deniability. The attackers acting like typical Muslim extremists would use local Russian weapons, not imported NATO weapons.
Prior terrorist attacks in Dagestan were usually carried out by the local ISIS group. The Russia government is publicly blame who is convenient, the US and NATO over Ukraine. Internally, they are going to step up their anti-terrorism efforts. The first they will look at is ISIS given their history in the region. It is more likely ISIS is behind this, not Kaydrov.