Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Rummyfan

Writing legal services when the vendor is an attorney is not falsifying records. I write Staples, Blick, etc etc (vendor)...the receipts are in the shoe box.


4 posted on 05/18/2024 11:24:26 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau
Even campaigns have legal expenses. What are THEY supposed to write on the checks?

It seems to me that the issue is not what was written in the memo of the check or how it was booked. Bragg is trying to say that the "crime" was paying for it with campaign money, not that it was a "legal expense" that was booked as a legal expense that was paid for with personal money.

The problem with Bragg's argument is two-fold:

  1. There is prior precedent in many cases that cash is fungible and it can't be determined which dollar bill is a campaign dollar versus a personal dollar.

  2. Bragg can't bring the charge that it should have been paid for with campaign money, because the FEC and DoJ have jurisdiction over federal elections and the New York State Public Campaign Finance Board has sole jurisdiction over state campaign finance abuses. That leaves Bragg with fraudulent records in furtherance of another crime as the only charge he can make.
-PJ
10 posted on 05/18/2024 12:49:36 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson