Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: frogjerk

Yes you are deflecting, wishing to make selective prosecution arguments rather than answering the question stated, clearly trying to deflect and change the argument.

I asked you would you be Saying these people shouldn’t be prosecuted if they were blocking access to a gun range rather than an abortion clinic. That’s not deflecting that’s pointing out the selective outrage.

The law is the law, these people felt compelled to violate it for their reasons, that is their decision, but part of that decision is you accept the consequences of violating the law.

I don’t care what your cause is, or whether I agree or disagree with it, if you choose to violate the law, you have made a conscious choice that you will face the consequences of doing so.


22 posted on 05/18/2024 8:40:36 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay
The law is the law, these people felt compelled to violate it for their reasons, that is their decision, but part of that decision is you accept the consequences of violating the law.

If the law is unjust and selective prosecution is being employed I don't think you can be satisfied with just accepting the unjust law's sentencing. Another part of the reason for breaking the unjust law is to destroy the unjust law and its unjust penalties.

23 posted on 05/20/2024 6:05:44 AM PDT by frogjerk (More people have died trusting the government than not trusting the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson