Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seven More Pro-Life Activists Sentenced to Prison for Protesting at Late-Term Abortion Clinic
Gateway Pundit ^ | May. 18, 2024 | By Cassandra MacDonald

Posted on 05/18/2024 9:44:31 AM PDT by Kazan

Seven pro-life activists were sentenced to prison this week for protesting at a late-term abortion clinic in 2020.

The activists were convicted of violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act and “conspiracy against rights” for a sit-in protest at the Surgi-Clinic in Washington, D.C.

Three activists were sentenced on Tuesday, and four more were sentenced on Wednesday.

The Daily Wire reports:

On Wednesday, Jonathan Darnel, Herb Geraghty, Jean Marshall, and Joan Bell were all sentenced to prison. Darnel got 34 months in prison, Geraghty got 27 months, Marshall got 24 months, and Bell got 27 months. The sentences followed Tuesday’s sentencing of Lauren Handy to 57 months in prison, as well as John Hinshaw (21 months) and William Goodman (27 months).

During the protest, the pro-life protesters sang songs, prayed, locked arms in front of the facility’s staff entrance, and attached themselves with ropes and chains to block doors inside the building.

“As evidenced by today’s sentencings, the FBI and our judicial system will not tolerate the obstruction of civil rights,” said David Sundberg of the FBI Washington Field Office. “The FBI will continue to investigate FACE Act violations in all jurisdictions, so patients and providers can exercise their right to receive or provide lawful reproductive health care without the threat of violence or intimidation.”

In 2022, Handy, obtained a box containing 115 aborted fetuses from outside the Surgi-Center. Five of them appeared to be within the 26-32 week range, which is typically considered far enough along to survive outside the womb.

Last week, the remains of five infants were delivered to DC Metro police in a condition consistent with partial birth abortion or infanticide.

I’m calling for a full medical examination and police investigation to determine when and how these innocent babies died. pic.twitter.com/B2wRkKNgzs

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) April 5, 2022

Handy and other anti-abortion activists called on the District of Columbia to investigate if any of the babies had been born alive, but the city refused. Partial-birth abortion remains against the law in the district.

Ashan Benedict, D.C. police’s executive assistant chief of police, said during a press conference that they appeared to have been aborted “in accordance with D.C. law [and] there doesn’t seem to be anything criminal in nature about that except for how they got into this house.” The department refused to order autopsies to confirm the claim.

The clinic is run by Dr. Cesare Santangelo, who was captured on video by Live Action News in 2013 saying that he does not provide life-saving care for viable, premature babies born after a failed abortion.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abortion; corruption; dissent; freespeech; politicalprisoners; prolife; twotiereddoj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: oldtech

A murderer is always right in today’s America. As long as it is an unborn or partially born baby that is being killed and not an animal.


21 posted on 05/18/2024 3:09:07 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Yes you are deflecting, wishing to make selective prosecution arguments rather than answering the question stated, clearly trying to deflect and change the argument.

I asked you would you be Saying these people shouldn’t be prosecuted if they were blocking access to a gun range rather than an abortion clinic. That’s not deflecting that’s pointing out the selective outrage.

The law is the law, these people felt compelled to violate it for their reasons, that is their decision, but part of that decision is you accept the consequences of violating the law.

I don’t care what your cause is, or whether I agree or disagree with it, if you choose to violate the law, you have made a conscious choice that you will face the consequences of doing so.


22 posted on 05/18/2024 8:40:36 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
The law is the law, these people felt compelled to violate it for their reasons, that is their decision, but part of that decision is you accept the consequences of violating the law.

If the law is unjust and selective prosecution is being employed I don't think you can be satisfied with just accepting the unjust law's sentencing. Another part of the reason for breaking the unjust law is to destroy the unjust law and its unjust penalties.

23 posted on 05/20/2024 6:05:44 AM PDT by frogjerk (More people have died trusting the government than not trusting the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson