Posted on 05/11/2024 5:19:14 AM PDT by Twotone
There's been another internal email leak from a Pfizer ‘whistleblower’ to top off the testimony from Pfizer reps to Senator Malcolm Roberts at a recent Senate hearing in Australia. I tend to be more persuaded by the latter, but confirmations are always valuable. Click on the photo below to hear the Pfizer reps admit to this, and interestingly, what they say is almost verbatim what is written in the ‘internal email’.
Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccines specifically for the employee vaccination program. Theroux and Hewitt - Pfizer reps. (Forgive me if the names are mis-spelled.)
Here’s a screenshot of the ‘Whistleblower’ email. Source: https://slaynews.com/news/pfizer-whistleblower-leaks-email-separate-covid-shots-employees/.
The vaccine doses to be used for this program are separate and distinct from those committed by Pfizer to governments around the world and will not impact supply to national governments in any way. Pfizer ‘Whistleblower’
Well, that’s a relief. At least us employees in the ‘program’ won’t be diggin’ into the other government-mandated doses. Phew.
What exactly do they mean by separate and distinct? Separate, I can understand. Don’t want to take someone else’s precious shot - you know, favoritism is not allowed in government. But distinct? Huh? How are they distinct? Exactly? Exactly.
Let's repeat this really clearly.
Separate shots for 'employees'. This necessarily means one of two things: that there were batches that were less harmful than others, or that there were known placebo batches (saline injections - and I mean, true saline injections that would be harmless).
If the former is true, that there is known variation between batches (whatever this means), then the batches were designed this way. If THIS is true, then we have intent on our hands. I still have trouble imagining that they would be capable of varying at will or by demand in a way that would ever be predictably variably harmful. I mean, it seems to me that the manufacturing practices themselves were simply ridiculous in their bug-duggery (think DNA:RNA hybrids/contamination), so if we accept this as reality, how can we accept that they tailored batches to be variably harmful? Perhaps only some of them had the SV40 built into their plasmids for modified mRNA production? I don’t know.
Craig Pardekooper has been devout about batches having variable harms, and I have been writing about this for years now to try to understand the mechanisms by which this might be possible. And of course, there is the excellent study published by Schmeling et al. that reinforces that different batches are more highly-associated with serious adverse events, but still. How?
Could it be the people who make the difference? Genetic variations in ACE-2 receptors? Again, I don’t know for sure.
In any case, I believe that these 'reserved batches' for the Aussie employees were likely saline injections. As in, true saline injections.
After years of many of us trying to crack this egg, please pass on the gravity of this potential reality to whomever is interested in listening.
If there is variable toxicity in these batches of COVID-19 shots, this would also provide an explanation for the variability in AE and SAE presentations. It is very likely however, that other factors are at play. I want to stress this. Variability in harms also comes down to differences in the actual people injected, and most importantly, not only what they were injected with, but how, and if, the contents of the syringe were ‘cloudy’ or ‘clumpy’ or ‘degraded’ or etc...
Can you imagine how insufferable they (the hyperjabbed) must be to one another when they get together without HBH?
Yes, I’m convinced that many of the politicians and celebrities who made a show of being “vaccinated” on camera were given saline or an otherwise attenuated version. Remember there was that head nurse at a prominent hospital in Eastern Europe who was in charge of giving the shot to prominent persons. She said in a news conference that she was ordered to give the public figures shots only from batch numbers ending in a particular number — or something like that — and not from batches used for the general public.
humility not your strong suit, DD?
Orthostatic hypotension - actually rather common especially with age. She should get a cardiac work up...
It didn’t matter what was in them. If you had half a brain you wouldn’t take it at all. Lots of people fell for it though.
I’m sorry for all that you were MADE to endure, with these horrid $hots, your dear dad, the VA, etc.
Hell is too nice a place, for TPTB that mandated these things.
one guy in new jersey wrote: “humility not your strong suit, DD?”
Formal logic not your strong suit, OGINJ?
Please look up the word “HYPOTHESIS” and get back to us after you’ve learned the difference between that and question-begging.
“DumbwayDupe”
“Reserved batches” = saline
metmom : "If the batches were variable in their harm, then it was deliberate.
Otherwise, how would they know if something in manufacture caused it?
And if they knew that and released them anyways, it’s still deliberate.
But since they knew it at the time, then there’s no question it was deliberate."
(From the article): ”There's been another internal email leak from a Pfizer ‘whistleblower’ to top off the testimony from Pfizer reps to Senator Malcolm Roberts at a recent Senate hearing in Australia.
I tend to be more persuaded by the latter, but confirmations are always valuable.
Click on the photo below to hear the Pfizer reps admit to this, and interestingly, what they say is almost verbatim what is written in the ‘internal email’. “
”Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccines specifically for the employee vaccination program.
Theroux and Hewitt - Pfizer reps. (Forgive me if the names are mis-spelled.) “
”Here’s a screenshot of the ‘Whistleblower’ email.(in the article)
Source:
https://slaynews.com/news/pfizer-whistleblower-leaks-email-separate-covid-shots-employees/. “
”The vaccine doses to be used for this program are separate and distinct from those committed by Pfizer to governments around the world
and will not impact supply to national governments in any way. Pfizer ‘Whistleblower’ ...”
Separate shots for 'employees'.
This necessarily means one of two things: that there were batches that were less harmful than others, or that there were known placebo batches (saline injections - and I mean, true saline injections that would be harmless). “
If the former is true, that there is known variation between batches (whatever this means), then the batches were designed this way.
If THIS is true, then we have intent on our hands.
I still have trouble imagining that they would be capable of varying at will or by demand in a way that would ever be predictably variably harmful. “
(My Opinion) : This probably explains why Jacinda Ardern, former Prime Minister of New Zealand (2017–2023), and an active agent of the World Economic Forum (WEF), retired suddenly
after a government agent detected different responses to different batches of the covid vaxxine in the limited numbers of the New Zealand population.
The day the whistle-blower released his data, he was immediately arrested,
and Jacinda Arden threatened anyone who released his data with incarceration, even though she was no longer in office.
The location and disposition of that whistle-blower, who demonstrated different effects of different batches of vaxxine remains unknown at this time
How is this not a crime against humanity with different batches having different effects, including injury, adverse effects, or death ?..which negates all civil indemnity ?
How is this batch differences, NOT A CRIMINAL FRAUD ?
one guy in new jersey wrote: “Please look up the word “HYPOTHESIS” and get back to us after you’ve learned the difference between that and question-begging.”
The author begged the question by limiting his alternatives to those two.
Dimly recall the country was Slovenia, and there was a digit in the middle of the batch number. ‘0’ was for important people.
Also it has come out that New Zealand has a list of 11,000 people who were permitted to have full civil rights without taking the vaxx.
Please remember to keep taking all of your boosters RELIGIOUSLY because I truly care about you and your fellow hypochondriacs ;)
The ol’ “Don’t pee in your own...”
Congress and related federal agencies enabled their own work-arounds.
The entire vax crime from the beginning was (and continues to be) a diabolical plan to kill and maim as many as possible, while making $$$. Crimes against humanity, need Nuremberg type trials, and then executions.
wildcard_redneck wrote: “You and your fellow lemmings bought into all the crap directives from the CDC that proved to be useless like masking, social distancing, and lockdowns.”
Refresh my memory show me where I ever supported masking, social distancing and lockdowns.
Look at how many in Congress and the Senate are over 70. NONE of them got the real shot both parties. They all got saline shots. But a lot of us oldsters out here in flyover country got the real deal and a lot are dead because of it.
PING
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.