[ClearCase_guy]

1) I am quite convinced that 2020 was stolen and that Trump won.

2) The best we seem to ever do to expose the steal — is to come up with evidence that “kind of looks suspicious”. If you’ve been paying attention, you know that saying “doesn’t this look strange?” isn’t getting us anywhere at all.

3) Neither political party has any interest in cleaning up the process.

4) 2024 will be just like 2020. Because why wouldn’t it be?

[Phlyer]

1) I am quite convinced that 2020 was stolen and that Trump won.

Bingo!!

2) The best we seem to ever do to expose the steal — is to come up with evidence that “kind of looks suspicious”.

This is the key, and your comment explains the problem. First,, the whole point of the 'secret' ballot is so that officials can't persecute someone for the way they voted. This is essential. However, it also means - on unverified main-in ballots - that as soon as the ballot is separated from the envelope, no matter how fraudulent the envelope is (signature not verified, dead voter, non-registered voter) there is no way to tell who was selected on the once-enclosed-and-now-dissociated ballot. Even if there was absolute proof of 100,000 bad ballots on a race decided by 1,000 votes, there is no way to prove that the bad ballots were cast for the 'winner' or the 'loser.'

Your comment allows them to continue to steal elections, because it implies there is a need to 'expose the steal.' We have lost, and will continue to lose, until the burden of proof on a valid election is placed on those controlling the election, not on those contesting it. The various secretaries of state need to be able to 'prove' the election was fair in the same what that a prosecutor needs to 'prove' chain of custody on relevant evidence. If that chain of custody is broken, the evidence is invalid on that basis alone and the suspect cannot be convicted. And so . . .

4) 2024 will be just like 2020. Because why wouldn’t it be?