Posted on 02/01/2024 8:01:01 AM PST by bitt
The United States Capitol Police have concluded their investigation into a controversial incident involving Aidan Maese-Czeropski, a 24-year-old former aide to Democratic Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland.
Maese-Czeropski had been embroiled in a scandal after a sexually explicit video recorded in the Senate hearing room surfaced online.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Gee, if only the J6ers were having anal sex none of them would have been charged.
Project Progressive Prolapse
Full Speed Ahead.
In 1974, the Navy’s Blue Jackets Manual listed Homosexuality, Sodomy and Beastiality as illegal. Anal sex in the Senate Conference Room should fall under all 3 of the above. I know they changed the law but what’s really changed to make it beneficial. Same detrimental effect. Basically two males raping each other. Firing and 6 months in the DC Gulag. Rotten animals.
I still want to know who the other guy was. I cannot believe this has never been verified.
We’ve succeeded in eliminating crime - by definition.
If it was two Republicans having hetrosexual sex it would be a different story.
Why am I not surprised.
Rules for use of Congressional meeting rooms
https://cvc.aoc.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CVC_PolicyUse_MeetingRoomSpaces_July2015Update.pdf
It might not be criminal. But it is irresponsible and gross. Losing his job is wholly appropriate.
We have become too reliant in our thinking that govt and laws are the way to change things.
Not surprised. Congress has been screwing it’s citizens for a long time
So its legal for everyone to screw in the Capitol hearing rooms now? Or just fags?
Get slammed in the butthole by another man, naked as a jaybird, in Senate chambers.... and no problem.
But walk through the velvet ropes, and 3 years in solitary with no trial.
It’s basic indecent exposure or public lewdness.
Any vice cop could tell you that.
I know it from sitting on a grand jury.
They just didn’t want to prosecute gays/demoncrats.
I get ya. It was a sarcastic, defeatist, throw-away line. Picture one of the former “Lions of the Senate” debating the rules...No sodomy on Sunday, any commingling of more than three persons shall require that both Parties are represented...
LOL...I can just see those lawyer “Lions of the Senate” debating the new rule, crossing the aisle, bipartisanship, etc. The R’s would be repulsed (well, maybe a few) and the D’s would be salivating to try out the new rules.
Highly inappropriate does not always mean criminal. Violation of the House rules does not always mean criminal.
The idiot was publicly humiliated and fired. I’d say justice was done.
No crime, Congress is in the business of screwing everyone.
This is BS.
http://dccode.elaws.us/code?no=22-1312
§ 22-1312. Lewd, indecent, or obscene acts.
It is unlawful for a person, in public, to make an obscene or indecent exposure of his or her genitalia or anus, to engage in masturbation, or to engage in a sexual act as defined in § 22-3001(8). It is unlawful for a person to make an obscene or indecent sexual proposal to a minor. A person who violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than $500, imprisoned for not more than 90 days, or both.
I had to think a bit more about your comment “The Senate makes its own rules.”
Now I get it. Good one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.