Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Franklin
I know that, however, the states demanded that the guarantees be included. Don't believe do some investigating by digging into what I provided deeper. Otherwise, explain why those items speaking on invasion are included in the constitution in the first place.🙂

It was to prevent a president like Biden from doing exactly what he is doing. Not following the Constitutional pact between the states & the Federal Government that the states deemed necessary to give the Federal Government exclusive domain over immigration. That was that the Federal had to respond to help quell either an invasion or insurrection. because they had already seen biases between states as well as border incursions from Mexico.

103 posted on 03/30/2024 7:50:32 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Robert DeLong
I know that, however, the states demanded that the guarantees be included. Don't believe do some investigating by digging into what I provided deeper. Otherwise, explain why those items speaking on invasion are included in the constitution in the first place.🙂

SCOTUS doesn't agree that criminal cartels engaged in the human trafficking of economic migrants is an invasion, just a refuge crisis. It's all in how the language of the constitution gets defined. If Trump takes office, he needs to call it an invasion. Then SCOTUS might behave itself.
104 posted on 03/31/2024 3:31:47 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson