Posted on 01/20/2024 3:17:41 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man
You mean like Obama? Lot of good It did keeping him out.
We are so good at trashing and degrading the reporters on our side. We don’t need the left MSM to tear them down. We do it for them.
We are so good at trashing and degrading the reporters on our side. We don’t need the left MSM to tear them down. We do it for them.
“here is no ambiguity”
Tell us in a few sentences the proof the article gives.
Where does it say that?
One point to make about obama’s obama father, is that under US law it is doubtful that the marriage of Stanley Ann to obama Sr. (if that did indeed happen) would have been legal as he had several wives in Kenya. So, that would make of obama jr. a bastard. IF Stanley Ann and Sr. had never ‘tied the knot’, that would make of obama jr. a bastard. Under either scenario obama jr. would be a natural born cit., because the bastard child’s citizenship would follow the mothers. It was absolutely that way at the time the Constitution was signed.
“That horse left the barn once Obama was elected. It’s stupid to keep bringing it up time and time again.”
That’s not the way any of this works. But that IS how the attempt to work around Art. II has gone forward. It’s been a dark work in progress for many decades, but until obama it never quite worked. Sadly people allowed themselves to be convienced that the fourteenth amendment AMENDED Art. II, but it did not and was never intended to. It turned out to have a trojan horse effect.
I did do a search. I knew the article was up and I posted my own. I might post another one when I feel like it.
I don’t post trash. I post the factual truth. I see you’re clearly triggered. Excellent, Most Excellent!
This is a very well written on the history and case law on this issue (citizenship qualification of presidents). And anchor babies are not citizens.
It has been decided already.
Minor v happersett
“Tell us in a few sentences the proof the article gives.”
What good would it do, if it were possible at all? You can’t read, obviously.
The man writes a long article to make his point, and I am supposed to quote a few sentences to encompass and capture his whole argument?
No it’s not
Interesting article, however what is the relevance? She is not going to get near the nomination.
Now that you’ve taken your juvenile jab, tell us which part of Loomer’s reporting is wrong.
“Maybe so maybe not, until the Supreme Court hears a case due to the ambiguity of the amendment..”
Ummmm, did I miss something like an amendment to the Constitutional requirements for President ?
-fjROberts-
“Personally I’ll wait for the SCOTUS to make a determination, if they ever do”
Until then I’ll contentedly suck my thumb while going along with our idoicracy that drools over the MSM/deepState will that gave us taqiyya muslim America destroyer HusseinOasma.
-fJRoberts-
Your determination of the U.S. Constitution is determined by Cornell Law School?
you’re the problem
“SCOTUS had 8+ years to rule on this when Barack Hussein Obama was nominated twice ..”
Don’t be such a j@cka$$! DID they rule on it? you know that they didn’t
If our “wonderful US Constitution intended the definition of NBC as having both parents” ,’blah, blah, blah
WHY did the Framers make a distinction between citizens and natural born Citizens for the office of the Presidency?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.