Posted on 01/07/2024 1:43:13 AM PST by spirited irish
Exactly! They shouldn’t be having those turbo cancers, but things have been ramped up. And we’re all looking away. Doctors are baffled.
Thank you for your comment.
What the heck are you talking about?
His data here is based exclusively on officially reported deaths.
I’m talking about reading with a critical eye.
And knowing the background of a writer is part of developing that critical eye.
It doesn’t mean what a writer composes is immediately discounted.
It does mean that knowing a writer’s potential bias is a consideration.
Let’s all have yet one more round of circular arguments. You so easily poo poo 17 million deaths that have been directly related to the Vax. Okay, that’s your prerogative.
Question - how many of those 17 MILLION would be alive today if they didn’t get the Vax? Whatever number you or anybody picks would be IMPOSSIBLE to prove.
Correllary, you said, “But we never hear from your side the number of lives it saves.” So tell us all Mr. esteemed DR, EXACTLY HOW MANY lives were saved by the Vax and what is your proof?
Just because someone who is ALIVE TODAY, after receiving the Vax say three years ago is NOT ABSOLUTE PROOF the Vax saved them. ALL this proves is that the Vax didn’t kill them and MAYBE just MAYBE the Vax saved them. THAT is something we will never know for sure.
It would seem easier to prove cause of death as opposed to proving cause of still being alive.
Bottom line -
Did the Vax kill people, ABSOLUTELY
Did the Vax save people, Maybe, Probably, Hopefully.
RIP DG
You’ve questioned his credibility here, so I am asking what you are basing that on.
Re: 27 - he was removed from his teaching position at uOttawa for among other things academic integrity issues (changing the class requirements and teaching social activism rather than the physics course he was obliged to teach, and refusing to grade objectively).
You sound like a leftist university administrator!
Just reading wikipedia on it makes it pretty clear that his outspoken, non-leftist politics were at the core of the challenge to him:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Rancourthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Rancourt
Some are predicting there will be much higher death rates in 2024 due to the fake vaxes.
Your “valid arguments” are shiite/Schiff.
You don’t hear any lives it saves because those vaxes weren’t engineered to save lives. That is why.
Prove the jabs saved anyone from death by covid.
I know a number of people being hospitalized this year for a combination of Flu and Covid together - the single contributing factor is they all had at least 2 covid jabs.
Bret Weinstein’s recent interview with Tucker Carlson is worth watching.
LOL!
Right….
No, I’m a believer in professors grading objectively based on the course syllabus, which in many ways is a contract between student and professor.
And regarding his positions? Let’s take a look at a course he was supposed to teach - PHY 1703 at uOttawa. Here is the course description at:
https://catalogue.uottawa.ca/en/courses/phy/
“PHY 1703 Physics and environment (3 credits)
Course designed for the environmental studies program. This course introduces the fundamental physical concepts useful for the study of the impact of human activity on the environment: conservation principles, notion of energy, energy sources; physical limit of the efficiency of energy transformations; transport of contaminants; noise pollution; nuclear energy, effects of radioactivity and radiation. This course cannot be credited to students enrolled in the Faculty of Science or the Faculty of Engineering.
Component: Lecture”
Rancourt took that course and turned it into “Activism: Power and its Contexts”. Unilaterally. And changed the grading scheme. I’m still trying to find the updated syllabus for Rencourt’s change.
You can read about Rencourt’s disciplinary issues here:
Eventually, Rencourt ended up being sued for libel after he referred to a fellow professor as a “house negro”:
“On his 2011 U of O Watch blog, he twice referred to St. Lewis, who is black, as then President Allan Rock’s “house negro”—someone who is a traitor to her race. After Rancourt refused to remove the offending posts, St. Lewis sued him for libel.”
- see https://thepostmillennial.com/campus-activism-off-the-rails-revisiting-st-lewis-v-rancourt/
Calling someone a “house negro” would seem to be the mark of a leftist vs. a non-leftist. But Rencourt is a complicated person - hence the advice to read his writings with a higher than normal dose of skepticism.
—-> But we never hear from your side the number of lives it saves.
Unless you post the names of those whose lives are saved, it’s a theory.
How many lives are saved when the virus had a 99.97% survival rate?
The Lord gave my body an immune system, i will use it. I never “ locked down “ the first time. I will not do it now.
If there were that many more deaths than usual, no matter what the cause, it should show up in population statistics... Unless most happened in China, then we’ll never know.
Re: 36 - so now people need the NAMES of people whose lived were saved.
A good example of how the quality of argument has declined since 2020.
Interesting. Looks like he indeed may be not a right-wing, but a leftist professor who used the “house negro” slur against a professor who didn’t endorse a report on “systemic racism” on campus in the way he wanted.
So he lost his position and had a sizable settlement declared against him. Curious now that he’s started on the “medical dissident” international conference circuit with the likes of Robert Malone. Also, as JJ Couey pointed out, Rancourt has gone after RFKJ online while not even nicely pointing out to the Malone types when they site his 17M but ignore his evidence that there was never a deadly, spreading, novel virus at all.
Interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.