No I’m very familiar with intelligent design and biology both. I’m also familiar with the fact that you have the reading comprehension of a drunk 5 year old.
That is NOT an intelligent design argument. That is a metaphorical argument, paralleling the chip software relationship to the bio-genesis evolution relationship. People studying evolution DON’T study bio-genesis, even though you have to have life for it to evolve, because it’s a different field. Just like software engineers don’t know how to design chips, even though you have to have chips to run software, because it’s A DIFFERENT FIELD.
Another strawman. When you realize your questions are both stupid and pointless you’ll begin to understand.
“ People studying evolution DON’T study bio-genesis”
Tell that to Jergen Brosius and all the RNAers.
You simply repeat silly platitudes you don’t understand.