Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: devere

Their claim to have adopted him was wrong, when they just put him under conservatorship. That was probably a heartfelt sentiment, as opposed to a legal standing. They made him as much of a son as they could.


15 posted on 10/06/2023 6:48:10 PM PDT by Jonty30 (It never rains in sunny Alberta. It always rains in rainy Alberta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

“The Tuohys refuted his [Oher’s] claim that they told him they intended to legally adopt him.”


17 posted on 10/06/2023 6:49:36 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

Here’s what the judge said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/judge-orders-michael-oher-s-conservatorship-with-the-tuohy-family-to-end-i-cannot-believe-it-got-done/ar-AA1hAXPG

It looks to me like it was a well-planned scam, but not racist.


21 posted on 10/06/2023 6:51:58 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

They could have actually adopted him — there was and is no age limit on that in Mississippi.

The help they did give him was not legal under NCAA rules unless they had adopted him or put him under conservatorship (which he agreed to).

Did they do it because they were Ole Miss boosters or because they wanted to help him?


29 posted on 10/06/2023 7:03:12 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson