Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

“The Tuohys refuted his [Oher’s] claim that they told him they intended to legally adopt him.”


17 posted on 10/06/2023 6:49:36 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: kiryandil

In Michael’s first book, he wrote that it was explained to him that they could not legally adopt him because of his age.

So, giving a good faith interpretation, they may have told him that they were going to adopt him but found out that they couldn’t. So, they did the next best thing they could to adoption.

My point is that I don’t think there was any deception on the Tuohy’s part. They thought they could and they looked into it and did what they could for him. They still treated him as their son.


24 posted on 10/06/2023 6:56:11 PM PDT by Jonty30 (It never rains in sunny Alberta. It always rains in rainy Alberta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson