[Dilbert San Diego]

Well, isn’t it a good idea, to listen to your lawyers, when in legal trouble?

Maybe some of the info. he has, is best reserved for the trial?

Stay tuned.

[Signalman]

Maybe some of the info. he has, is best reserved for the trial?

That's the best advice. If there's any information that will exonerate the defendant, present it at the trial. Disclosing it on TV is a publicity stunt. Why disclose it to the prosecution, before the trial begins?

[Boogieman]

“Well, isn’t it a good idea, to listen to your lawyers, when in legal trouble?”

If that legal trouble is a political persecution, maybe not. You’re not going to win such a case unless you can also win the political fight that is accompanying it, no matter how good your lawyers’ advice is.

[mewzilla]

You don’t think he’d already done that before announcing it...?

Reads to me like Deep State is getting antsy.

If so...

GOOD.

[joesbucks]

Lusteninf to lawyers is what’s got him in this mess.

He should be his own man and proceed with his event next week.

[mass55th]

"Maybe some of the info. he has, is best reserved for the trial?"

You actually think a hand-picked Judge is going to let any evidence he has be admissible in a court of law? The Supreme Court wouldn't even hear any evidence of voter fraud, but you expect a County Judge to allow it? He's going to be found guilty whether he gives the press conference or not. Then he will appeal the decision.