[Alberta's Child]

Congress has no power to enforce Executive Branch regulations. One of the defining characteristics of this country is that we have an independently elected President who oversees one whole branch of government.

If a particular regulation is so important, then it should be passed into law.

Merrick Garland had no obligation to appoint a stupid “special counsel” in the Hunter Biden case. Since that is the case, then what the hell difference would it make who he appointed?

I’m no fan of Lindsey Graham, but on this one he’s absolutely correct: “This is a political move, not a legal one.”

[SeekAndFind]

SOMEONE has to officially investigate the Hunter Biden case. If the Mueller Special Counsel was formed based on bogus, fabricated evidence, the evidence against Joe Biden in this particular case is not only REAL, it is OVERWHELMING taken together.

Garland FINALLY formed a Special Counsel based on OVERWHELMING PRESSURE. I see no reason to let up that pressure now to FORCE HIM to follow Federal Regulations.

Morally and in the interest of Justice ( he is the head of that department), he is OBLIGATED to follow regulations. He cannot just say “I will ignore it because of who I am”. That’s totalitarianism and we cannot tolerate that.

If he can be pressured to form a special counsel, he HAS TO BE pressured to appoint an INDEPENDENT ONE based on Federal Regulations.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Congress has no power to enforce Executive Branch regulations.

Congress has the power to PRESSURE the Executive Branch to follow regulations. They already successfully pressured Garland to form a special counsel, take the pressure further- FORCE HIM TO FOLLOW FEDERAL REGULATIONS.