Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: “We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election”

The Gateway Pundit ^ | August 2, 2023 | Brian Lupo

[frnewsjunkie]

This morning, Steve Bannon was looking forward to getting all they have, out and presented in court

He said “game on!”

[frnewsjunkie]

They have it backward.. always do. They charge Trump with what they are doing.

[Still Thinking]

Even if these were false claims and even if Trump knew that, so what? You can indict somebody for that now?? BS

[avital2]

“a distraction to keep Trump voters fighting the wrong issues.” —— ??? since when is fair and free elections a distraction or a wrong issue? or perhaps you didn’t keep up with the many hijinks used to turn 2020 election. you might start with just reading up on Maricopa County alone.

[Political Junkie Too]

Will she allow total discovery because we all know Jack Smith and his goons will try to block them from presenting election fraud to the jurors.

They should challenge the judge based on her own work history.

The judge overseeing President Trump's case for questioning the 2020 election worked for David Boies, the lawyer that represented Al Gore as he questioned the 2000 election in Florida!

Lauro should ask the judge of Mr. Boies was restricted from presenting evidence during his defense of Al Gore's beliefs in 2020? Of course, that was in a Florida courtroom and not a federal one.

-PJ

[poconopundit]

This X post on what Mike Pence said on January 4th is very revealing — “We all got our doubts about the election”.

Wow, what Benedict Arnold this Pence is. His word is not worth a single pence.

[Political Junkie Too]

I think the call to litigate 2020 is a just a distraction to keep Trump voters fighting the wrong issues.

Consider that this isn't about actually "litigating" the 2020 election.

I think that what Lauro is saying that in order for President Trump to present a defense that he actually believed that he won the election and it was stolen from him (his 1st amendment right to speak out), then they have to show the evidence of WHY Trump believed what he did.

They have to show the reports of:

• states stopping counting simultaneously;
• the "burst pipe" in Fulton County that enabled the counters to send observers home;
• the suitcases of ballots being pulled out from under tables;
• the simultaneous jump in Biden votes in the middle of the night in multiple states;
• the nearly 90% turnout in Wisconsin
• the lack of signature verification in Pennsylvania;
• the sudden changing of deadlines to receive absentee ballots by some judges in Pennsylvania and elsewhere;
• the lack of matching absentee ballot requests that match to absentee ballots that were counted;
• and on and on and on...

All of these things would add up to a general belief that, state by state, coordinated shenanigans were in place to tilt the vote just enough to cause the state to go for Biden.

The defense will have to "relitigate" these things in order to present a pattern of facts that led President Trump to the good-faith conclusion that he reached, and that his speaking out against it was protected speech and a petition to the government for a redress of grievances.

-PJ

[Jonty30]

Because you are spending millions of dollars, trying to make things right, it costs them nothing but time to scheme for the next that they can get you to spend millions of dollars litigating.

While you are litigating everything, to try and make right, they are corraling the population under their control.

[Ann Archy]

John Lauro will be RAIDED and ARRESTED and ALL his Client’s papers will be seized by the FBI.....and ALL Democrats will CHEER!

[fieldmarshaldj]

Now we know what he meant by “we’ll have OUR day.” The day being the Derp State coup d’etat of the duly elected President, Donald Trump, aided and abetted by the treasonous Vice-President Pence.