Posted on 07/31/2023 5:57:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Obviously go get another vaxx jab with a vaccine that causes heart damage as the #1 side effect....to prevent covid heart damage.
Spin It anyway you want.
Our vile Marxist Overlords are planning their next move and as a Nation We are more vulnerable than at anytime in History.
I had three immediate family RNs, and it was difficult not
to consider COVID-19 vaccines here.
I did take the first double whammy shots.
For a full year, I developed a sensation in my chest area
adjacent to my heart and upper lungs.
One day shortly after a year, I woke up to the fact the
sensation had ceased.
I wonder how many other people developed something along
the same lines, and how many of them simply dropped dead.
I also wonder what would have come of this sensation had
I taken the boosters. They may have simply backed up the
sensation and caused it to remain active.
Sure glad I stopped when I did, even if it was too late
to avoid any reactions to the first shots.
Sorry, but “Oh look! The brought to you by Pfizer” parrot has arrived is not “abusive,” it’s the truth and you don’t like the truth.
Go ahead and try to have me banned. If you succeed, all my donations will be going to Alex Jones instead.
I barely fall in that age group, but my ticker is just fine. I didn’t get the Covid Shot.
Wait ——What?
Could you elaborate?
Whatever the cause, RFK, Tucker Carleson, Aaron Rodgers, and Ron Paul must be prohibited from commenting on it.
“Go ahead and try to have me banned.”
I have zero impact on who is banned.
I do have a relation who is an epidemiologist as well as internal medicine. He's gone before the FDA and had drugs approved.
He argues opposite your 'expertise'.
Whom to believe here - you or he?
Pacemaker here. Cardiologist wouldn’t let me vaxx for Covid even if i asked. He did give me a flu shot however. Enlarged heart was my major heart problem. The valves timing was off. It’s back to normal and healthy now. He doesn’t want to mess up his work.
“is not “abusive,”
That can be argued but you can’t argue that you did not violate many of the other cited examples, especially the sentence bolded.
One doesn’t have to be an expert to know that if something does not exist the it can not be the cause.
There ya go! You should have me banned.
Fortunately for me, my Doctor is a Conservative, and She would never have pushed the clot shot on me.
“He argues opposite your ‘expertise’.”
He says that the effects in 2020 were due to the shot given in 2021?
I don’t believe that. Give me his number and I will verify.
Climate change or racism.
“Could you elaborate?”
How? Per the article the rise started in 2020 before the vax was available.
>> Let’s think.
A snarky pejorative intimating your “logical” conclusions are perfectly correct — which we know are conclusively inaccurate given the documented deaths and injuries related to the vaxx.
So why did you put yourself out on a such a limb?
“So why did you put yourself out on a such a limb?”
To expose the truth using basic logic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.