Posted on 07/19/2023 8:45:20 AM PDT by JV3MRC
New York Times blowhard economics writer Paul Krugman apparently didn’t sense the stupidity in pontificating to readers about the supposed need to “politicize” the weather. Yes, you read that right.
Krugman took a pit stop from his usual Keynesian blather on economics to go on another ridiculous climate change rant in a July 17 op-ed headlined, “Why We Should Politicize the Weather.” The self-aggrandizing economist kicked up a stink over Republican presidential candidate Ron DeSantis’ recent statement that he “‘always rejected the politicization of the weather.’” But in Krugman’s pseudo-intellectual worldview, “we absolutely should politicize the weather.” In fact, he proclaimed with gusto, “weather is a political issue. And Americans should be aware that it’s one of the most important issues they’ll be voting on next November.” Cue the canned laughter.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Isn’t there a seminal work that can be pointed to that made him Nobel-worthy? Caught the attention of the committee?
If not his Nobel is about as meaningful as Zero’s!
They can’t get the weather right from day to day so how far in the future will they predict ?
There’s nothing libtards won’t twist for their own corrupt gain
Paul is one of the most consistently wrong prognosticators out there... He even fails the Stopped Clock is Right Twice a Day standard.
Who keeps putting a microphone in front of this idiot?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.