Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Published a few months before our glorious 2016 MAGA victory.
1 posted on 07/12/2023 3:27:26 PM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie
Back in the 1950s Congress did a serious investigation of the pros and cons of the current electoral college system, and decided that it should be kept. Getting rid of it and going to a national popular vote would destroy the two-party system at the state level.

Of course the Founders did not anticipate the rise of political parties. They expected electors to vote for men they knew from their own state mostly (so they put in the provision that they had to vote for at least one person not from their own state) and that the House of Representatives would pick the winner in most elections. Of course that has only happened twice but it could happen again if a third-party candidate got enough electoral votes to keep anyone from getting a majority. George Wallace thought he could do that in 1968.

2 posted on 07/12/2023 3:46:10 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie

What is the end result of 160 million sinners voting?


4 posted on 07/12/2023 6:24:48 PM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie

Barring a Constitutional amendment it can’t happen. The “compact” that some states (Maoist ones) have signed is unconstitutional unless it gets Congressional approval.


5 posted on 07/13/2023 4:18:38 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Two Words: BANANA REPUBLIC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson