If the sources and methods are so horrible—and unchanged after 60 years—they should be exposed.
And that is the president’s call, not the corrupt agencies’ call.
Roger Stone.
From the headline, I thought it would be Oliver Stone, director of the movie “JFK.”
He is related to several U.S. Presidents, signers of the Declaration of Independence, U.S. Army Generals, and U.S. Supreme Court Justices, among other famous people.
https://famouskin.com/famous-kin-menu.php?name=9730+lee+harvey+oswald
On the same website, his ancestry chart goes back to the 16th century:
http//famouskin.com/ahnentafel.php?name=9730+lee+harvey+oswald
Henry Lee Lucas (1936-2001) - another famous killer, used to be listed on famouskin.com, with ancestry going back a long way like Oswald's. In fact, I posted it here on FR a couple of years ago. Lucas is no longer listed on the site - looks to be completely scrubbed.
When ancestry info is scrubbed, we are being told outright that bloodlines are key, and will in many instances remain hidden. Especially with criminals like murderers and serial killers. Because if we find out that a number of the more famous ones come from very old bloodlines, which points to fakery - then the whole cookie starts to crumble pretty fast.
“Lee Harvey Oswald had gotten a, you know, 1099 from the FBI; that’s because he had been on their payroll. He was an informant; Lee Harvey Oswald had attended the foreign language school that is run by the Central Intelligence Agency in North Carolina.”
Surprise, surprise. Makes Kerry Thornley’s testimony seem much more credible now, despite the fact that he was a pretty weird dude.
Exactly.
When he had the chance, PDJT should’ve declassified and released everything re the JFK assassination as he promised he would do. He was talked out of it and, IIRC, Pompeo was one of those people.
Maybe he kept a copy of everything, as was this right. Can he still release of he’s not on office now?