He is related to several U.S. Presidents, signers of the Declaration of Independence, U.S. Army Generals, and U.S. Supreme Court Justices, among other famous people.
https://famouskin.com/famous-kin-menu.php?name=9730+lee+harvey+oswald
On the same website, his ancestry chart goes back to the 16th century:
http//famouskin.com/ahnentafel.php?name=9730+lee+harvey+oswald
Henry Lee Lucas (1936-2001) - another famous killer, used to be listed on famouskin.com, with ancestry going back a long way like Oswald's. In fact, I posted it here on FR a couple of years ago. Lucas is no longer listed on the site - looks to be completely scrubbed.
When ancestry info is scrubbed, we are being told outright that bloodlines are key, and will in many instances remain hidden. Especially with criminals like murderers and serial killers. Because if we find out that a number of the more famous ones come from very old bloodlines, which points to fakery - then the whole cookie starts to crumble pretty fast.
I do not understand what you are trying to convey, but I would like to.
What is the significance of a long bloodline to this story?
Who scrubbed ancestry info?
Who told whom that bloodlines are key?
What fakery is pointed to, by what?