Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/30/2023 6:41:09 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Carl Vehse

“... which was in violation of the Biden rule.”

Boo hoo.


2 posted on 05/30/2023 6:43:19 AM PDT by cdcdawg (Our empire of sodomy is failing as it should. How else could it go? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

Clearly the Democrats have had control of the Senate and White House too many years.


3 posted on 05/30/2023 6:43:36 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

Man we could use Grover Cleveland now!


4 posted on 05/30/2023 6:44:13 AM PDT by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA! AMERICA FIRST! DEATH TO MARXISM AND GLOBALISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

Shut up, traitor.


5 posted on 05/30/2023 6:44:48 AM PDT by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA! AMERICA FIRST! DEATH TO MARXISM AND GLOBALISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

I thought SCOTUS was supposed to be apolitical and to uphold the constitution.


6 posted on 05/30/2023 6:47:58 AM PDT by Polyxene (Out of the depths have I cried unto thee, O Lord. Lord, hear my voice: Psalm 130)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

And that’s bad because, ...?


7 posted on 05/30/2023 6:48:46 AM PDT by LIConFem (This Space For Rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

While Todd’s statement is untrue...

the fact should be that...

no democrat nominee should make it to the Supreme Court...

because democrats send nominees such sa Garrick Merlant for confirmation.

Republicans did exactly the right thing by refusing Garland’s nomination, as witnessed by how horrible he’s been as the head of the DOJ.

All three women on fhe Supreme Court now are there not because of merit, but because they are women and/or of a minority.

If merit were to be considered over “D.E.I”, democrats would nobody in SCOTUS.


9 posted on 05/30/2023 6:52:29 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

Misleading. Since there has been only one SCOTUS vacancy (Scalia) when there was a Democrat president and a Republican Senate.

Wilson - Democrat control of Senate from 1913-1919, no SCOTUS vacancies in last two years of administration

Roosevelt - no Republican control of Senate

Truman - Republican control of Senate from 1947-1947 - no SCOTUS vacancies

Kennedy - no Republican control of Senate

Johnson - no Republican control of Senate

Carter - no Republican control of Senate

Clinton - Republican control from 1995-2001 - 2 vacancies in 1993 and 1994; no vacancies until 2005

Obama - Republican control of Senate from 2015-2017 - 2 vacancies in 2009 and 2010; Scalia dies in 2016

Biden - no Republican control of Senate

So TOTALLY misleading!!

The Republican Senate in 2016 didn’t confirm Garland. So what! Whoopdeedoo!


12 posted on 05/30/2023 6:55:21 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

The Democrats made it partisan. Ted Kennedy’s legacy.


13 posted on 05/30/2023 6:55:39 AM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

Good for the Republicans. The other issue is that between Cleveland and FDR, there was only 1 other Dem President (Wilson). During and after FDR, Dems controlled the Senate many more times than Republicans. So the opportunity was simply not there.


16 posted on 05/30/2023 6:58:14 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

LOL. Cleveland appointed Edward Douglass White, who was a Confederate soldier and KKK member. He was a hardcore racist who voted in favor of Plessy. Is that what Chuck wants on the court?


17 posted on 05/30/2023 7:05:35 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

Todd Cries: GOP Hasn’t Confirmed A Dem SCOTUS

Pssst Todd it’s called Marxist control


21 posted on 05/30/2023 7:27:19 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

I don’t see the issue. Look what we get when leftists confirm justices: Wise Latinas, not biologists, and queer trolls.


22 posted on 05/30/2023 7:30:15 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

Cleveland?

Interesting choice for his lie, being as how Cleveland has been the only President to be reelected to nonconsecutive terms . . . so far.


24 posted on 05/30/2023 7:48:04 AM PDT by MCSETots (at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

If the “fool-me-once” rule were still active, the Dems’ most recent Trojan horse (Merrick Garland) nominee should keep the Senate from confirming another Dem for generations.


33 posted on 05/30/2023 11:30:43 AM PDT by rx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse

What an idiot


34 posted on 05/31/2023 7:25:33 AM PDT by Nifster ( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson