This has been posted several times. The woman was in violation of Minnesota law. Period. She did not do her due diligence when she was in arrears. The state applied the law and she lost her home.
Exactly. Under Minnesota law this process was not a tax foreclosure. It was a property abandonment, which makes a big difference when it comes to establishing the debtor’s legal claim to any equity in the property.
“This has been posted several times. The woman was in violation of Minnesota law. Period. She did not do her due diligence when she was in arrears. The state applied the law and she lost her home.”
But is the law constitutional?
“The woman was in violation of Minnesota law. Period.”
Then the law is an ass.