Posted on 04/25/2023 5:50:01 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
This is mind-blowing. Dr. Miriam Grossman tells how Dr. John Money of Johns Hopkins started this transgender movement with a family from Winnipeg whose son (one of twins) had "ambiguous" genitalia from a circumcision gone wrong.
Here's the blurb from youtube:
Listen as Dr. Jordan B. Peterson and Dr. Miriam Grossman walk us through the horrific and yet true story behind the Reimer twins. The atrocity of their upbringing, branded as a successful experiment by Dr. John Money, was used as the bedrock of gender and identity ideology that has captured the western world today.
“whose son (one of twins) had “ambiguous” genitalia from a circumcision gone wrong.”
Damn.......what’d he use, a chainsaw?
John Money was a very flawed human being - not a monster. I don’t even call Hitler or Stalin monsters as that somehow gives them an “excuse” — but these evil people chose to do evil, they will suffer the consequences for that. It was not predestined for them to be evil - they CHOSE it
John William Money (8 July 1921 – 7 July 2006) was a New Zealand psychologist, sexologist and author known for his research into sexual identity and biology of gender. He was one of the first researchers to publish theories on the influence of societal constructs of gender on individual formation of gender identity. Money introduced the terms gender role and sexual orientation and popularised the terms gender identity and paraphilia.[1][2]Working with endocrinologist Claude Migeon, Money established the Johns Hopkins Gender Identity Clinic, the first clinic in the United States to perform sexual reassignment surgeries on both infants and adults.[3] He spent a considerable amount of his career in the United States.
A 1997 academic study criticised Money's work in many respects, particularly in regard to the involuntary sex-reassignment of the child David Reimer, and Money's abuse of Reimer and his brother when they were children.[4] Some of Money's "therapy" sessions involved Money forcing the two children to perform sexual activities with each other, which Money then photographed, "for research". David Reimer lived a troubled life, eventually committing suicide at 38; his brother died of an overdose at age 36.[5][6]
Money's writing has been translated into many languages and includes around 2,000 articles, books, chapters and reviews. He received around 65 honours, awards and degrees in his lifetime.[1] He was also a patron of many famous New Zealand artists, such as Rita Angus and Theo Schoon.[7]
Source: Wikipedia
Sounds like a linguistics/semantics issue you have.
Cauterizing problem.
The twins who were the pillars of Money’s “research” revealed that in their private interviews with him, required as part of their “treatment,” Money groped and molested them - and then told them never to tell their parents what was happening.
Sounds like a straight-up, filthy pedo to me
“Some of Money’s “therapy” sessions involved Money forcing the two children to perform sexual activities with each other, which Money then photographed, “for research”.
This story was used by an episode of L+O:SVU a few years ago.
Of course on SVU the monster got killed by one of the twins.
Sounds like a linguistics/semantics point (i.e., point) youhaveare making.
I recall studying Money’s research back in the 70’s. He was experimenting with rats, giving them varying degrees of sex hormones in large quantities to see if he could create more sexes, in between male and female. Carrying that over to human subjects, yes, monster is not too large a term.
Progressives LOVE their “science” and “experts.”
One single “study” that confirms their perversions and lies and it is “settled science.” One study from a mutilated boy and it must be settled. One single uncontrolled study by an environazi and DDT killed millions through malaria. So many to list...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.