That’s a bit of a misleading description of what Barnes said (and thanks for posting the link on that other thread, BTW). He says the NYC case is the “strongest” not on the basis of the law, but for logistical and political reasons. The Georgia case will go nowhere because it’s a Republican state, and the Federal case is hampered by the political optics of having the DOJ prosecute a presidential candidate. And I fit all those qualifications in a headline HOW? But basically the headline is correct in that the reason is given in the video itself. And for a homework assignment, please write me a headline that not only contains the stipulations you point out but is BRIEF enough to fit in the title.
Sorry for the confusion. I wasn’t referring to the headline, but to this item below …
Namely that it is actually the STRONGEST of the cases.
When a lawyer describes a case as “strong,” it’s generally in the context of the merits of the case under the law — not for other reasons.