Posted on 03/13/2023 5:52:05 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
I say release enough to vindicate the jailed patriots. But slow drip the rest to make sure the seemingly attention deficit disorder public doesn’t quickly forget the Dims’ communist party tactics against their opposition.
Lacks context?
This from the department that lacks respect, intelligence, honesty, integrity, competence, and respect?
Eff you, DOJ and the turds you oozed from. I will enjoy what the crowds do to you, your families, and even your gravesites when the singularity correction comes.
LOL - how many days did it take them to come up with that lame “lacks context” defense?
Well,we’ll see what an appeals court says.
Projection much DOJ? Context? You mean spin. It lacks your spin. What it doesn’t lack is accuracy. The video is what it is. It speaks for itself.
And now it appears to be a non-story ...
That’s your tax dollars at work! Must have broke a sweat coming up with “lacks content”, I mean it’s not like the Pravda media already has it in their supplied script…
Context = progressive narrative / lies
What they mean is “it has TOO MUCH context”. But they have forgotten how to say things in a straight-forward way.
The last 22 years has been worse than learning there is no Santa Claus.
You spend much of your life being told about freedom, justice, equality under the law, and other things that made productive people want to come to this country. And then you have to unlearn all of that?
Life is too hard somedays.
What “context” does the “Justice” Dept. hold the Hunter Biden laptop in? Well, its been in the possession of the FBI since December 2019, or three years and four months and what “context” is that in? Its in no context, bc they have done NOTHING with it, never contacted Hunter’s business association Tony B after he briefed them, never did a damned thing unlike the phony Russian collusion garbage, the pressure to censor the story on Twitter, the raids by armed FBI agents on young fathers in front of their children, the attempt to humiliate Trump advisers by “arrests” over nonsensical charges by arresting them and chaining them in public. That is Mr. Garland’s “context”.
The solution is toprovide them more context, and take away their known fake and idiotic objection.
“Well, we’ll see what an appeals court says.”
I have no faith in the court system. It is after all the same courts won’t allow even one case of proof of voter fraud due to lack of standing.
Not one member of the Capitol Hill police physically barred the guy. They never laid their hands on him to try to stop him from continuing through the building. The DOJ’s problem is that no law enforcement officer attempted to stop Chansley. They simply walked behind him or at his side as if they were his escort service. At no time is Chansley shown to be belligerent, aggressive, or obstructive. If he was such a threat to everyone in the building as the DOJ has portrayed him, why wasn’t he tackled, cuffed, and removed from the building? The fact is that the DOJ can’t prove that Chansley conducted a violent entry and exhibited disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds, the charges they filed against him. No such video of him behaving that way exists, and they know it.
One thing the SVB story did was wipe this story off the news completely.
Even Tucker doesn’t mention it.
We must keep it alive.
Release all of it, McCarthy!
Apparently per his first attorney he has no appeal rights per the plea agreement. This was said last Tuesday night by said attorney
Totally agree!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.