Posted on 02/03/2023 6:51:32 AM PST by Red Badger
What is the Cochran Library?
“The Cochrane Library contains high-quality, independent evidence to inform healthcare decision-making. It includes reliable evidence from Cochrane and other systematic reviews, clinical trials, and more. Cochrane reviews bring you the combined results of the world’s best medical research studies, and are recognized as the gold standard in evidence-based health care.”
The Cochran Library has been reviewing the use of physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses since 2010. By physical interventions, they mean masks, shields, gowns, hand-washing, etc.
This is not some short-term project, but a long-term, serious meta-analysis review. As stated above, the Cochran reviews are considered the gold standard for health care agencies and professionals. When Jill and I took our fellowship training at Harvard in Global Clinical Research, the Cochran methodology for medical research meta-analysis was taught as the preferred method.
Background
Viral epidemics or pandemics of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) pose a global threat. Examples are influenza (H1N1) caused by the H1N1pdm09 virus in 2009, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 in 2019. Antiviral drugs and vaccines may be insufficient to prevent their spread. This is an update of a Cochrane Review last published in 2020. We include results from studies from the current COVID‐19 pandemic.
Authors’ conclusions
The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions. There were additional RCTs during the pandemic related to physical interventions but a relative paucity given the importance of the question of masking and its relative effectiveness and the concomitant measures of mask adherence which would be highly relevant to the measurement of effectiveness, especially in the elderly and in young children.
There is uncertainty about the effects of face masks. The low to moderate certainty of evidence means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited, and that the true effect may be different from the observed estimate of the effect.
The pooled results of RCTs did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks. There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection. Hand hygiene is likely to modestly reduce the burden of respiratory illness, and although this effect was also present when ILI and laboratory‐confirmed influenza were analysed separately, it was not found to be a significant difference for the latter two outcomes. Harms associated with physical interventions were under‐investigated.
There is a need for large, well‐designed RCTs addressing the effectiveness of many of these interventions in multiple settings and populations, as well as the impact of adherence on effectiveness, especially in those most at risk of ARIs.
This large group of international researchers reviewed dozens of rigorously correct, randomized clinical trials of “physical interventions” against respiratory diseases. These diseases included influenza and COVID-19 during the pandemic, and these researchers failed to find even a “modest effect” on infection or illness rates from any type of mask.
Furthermore, the effects that masking is having on health, childhood development, speech development, etc. are unknown and are under-investigated. Ergo – governments aren’t funding this research. Without government funding, the answer to the damage done will never be answered.
So, here we are in 2023. Why does this matter? Mask mandates are gone, right?
You think this is over?
Not for our children and grandchildren. The damage done is ongoing and real.
In blue states, such as New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Washington and California, masks in schools are still often required – Daily Mail.
Just look at recent headlines:
The CDC is still recommends masking in areas with “high” transmission levels and also recommends indoor masking to protect high-risk contacts in “medium” counties. Currently, that means 27% of all counties in the USA.
Scientism has replaced science.
Luckily, more and more Americans aren’t drinking the kool-aid. Only 15.5 percent of Americans have received the bivalent recent booster.
The CDC has now removed the category of 6 months to under five on its vaccine tracker page, but the data can be found on a deep dive. It appears to be about 8 percent vaccinated for this age cohort.
The message is getting out.
We must keep fighting for our children and our health.
Now it is time to get rid of the mask mandates, and the ability of the CDC to mandate products or massive quarantines ever again. It is time to regain personal freedoms lost.
I thought it was settled in the early 80’s when they did the mask test in an actual busy operating room for 6 months and found infections actually went DOWN!!!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf
The results of the relatively simple trial reported
here could easily be repeated and it would
be interesting to see whether comparable results
are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or
other general surgical theatres. The finding that
there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection
rate when masks were not worn certainly
warrants further investigation. This trial was
designed only to see whether wound infection increased,
as had been predicted, when masks were
not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that
the wearing of a mask has very little relevance
to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine
general surgery and it is a standard practice
that could be abandoned.
Do face masks work? Here are 49 scientific studies that explain why they do
But some people don't want to wear masks even for short periods when contagion rates are high. So it will NEVER be settled.
Where’d the Eggs Go? Multiple Studies Show Egg Yolk Antibodies Block the Binding of Multiple SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) Spike Protein Variants in BOMBSHELL REPORT https://thedcpatriot.com/whered-the-eggs-go-multiple-studies-show-egg-yolk-antibodies-block-the-binding-of-multiple-sars-cov-2-covid-19-spike-protein-variants-in-bombshell-report/
I thought “settled science” was something only leftists believed in ...
There may be a slight bit of virus mitigatasion with masks based on studies, but the public use is significantly different than a controlled lab. People touch, re-use, cough and sneeze into, and re-contaminate their unsanitary masks in public.
BINGO!!
Mitigation.
.... Furthermore, the effects that masking is having on health, childhood development, speech development, etc. are unknown and are under-investigated. Ergo – governments aren’t funding this research. Without government funding, the answer to the damage done will never be answered. ...
************
No need to study what should be common sense. Masks make it harder to breathe. Masks interfere with normal human communication.
What is an RCT? I didn’t see where the acronym was spelled out.
A randomized controlled trial ..................
AND.. masks are totally used wrong. No collection points to collect and store used masks for proper HAZMAT disposal. no protocol for proper donning and removal of masks, no time use recommendations for wearing of masks, no recommendations of when to change masks, etc., etc.
Everyone is looking for cover. Just wait until they release the data on myocardial damage, oncologic spread and reproductive damage with miscarriages and premature labor.... that Pfizer, Moderna, JNJ and all the other HID. I hope that some family members go barbarians on all the bureaucrats and executives and their families for the deaths and destruction they have caused the families of many innocent people that "trusted" the science and our government.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8586184/
the cdc knew this and even had this online...hahahaha
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
What fools I see wearing masks many still are using various types of cloth masks which are even less effective and unless they are frequently washed could become a biohazard in themselves. Masks are little more than talismans and badges of virtue signaling little different that the foul smelling asafedita bags worn to protect against the Spanish Flu more than a century ago.
I see a lot of Blacks still wearing them, especially older blacks......................
All you really need to know is that after SARS, everyone in China started wearing those stupid masks, any time they were out in public. It’s an obsession with them. So that’s basically a billion person live trial of the masks.
And it did absolutely nothing to stop the next two respiratory epidemics that started in China.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.