Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman
So the answer is that he provided them with Russian military hardware long before Russia recognized their autonomy I guess. I wonder if there are any international laws regarding that...

If there are such laws, then the U.S. would be held to those laws, would they not? We were providing weapons to Libya rebel forces, were we not. Most likely doing the same for rebel forces in Syria also. But that's okay, because we are the good guys, even when they are corrupt & lawless, according to you.

Russia was providing defensive weapons so that the Ukrainian citizens could protect themselves from the terrorism they were facing at the hands of the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion/Regiment of the Ukrainian National Guard; Special Tasks Patrol Police Branch (2014) that you all poo poo as irrelevant & immaterial, providing you even recognize then as being neo-Nazis.

Translation: anyone who disagrees with me must be ignorant, because I am all-knowing

Incorrect translation.

You are idiots because you refuse to accept the realities.

These are not things I made up, they are not even things I have discovered. They are things that others who have a far greater knowledge of that region then I cared to ever have, who have brought them to the discussion.

In fact, I was, for a brief period, a supporter of Ukraine & Zelenskyy. But I was still looking for a peaceful resolution to avoid a kinetic war, because our corrupt usurper in chief had already proven himself to be incompetent to do so. He couldn't even lead an orderly & safe withdrawal from Afghanistan.

There was such a path available to avoid a kinetic war, and the path was to force Ukraine to accept the Minsk Agreements to stop the hostilities in eastern Ukraine against the Russian speaking Ukrainian citizens.

But U.S. refused to take that available option because they desired & wanted to engage in a proxy war with Russia, using Ukraine as the battlefield, and the Ukrainian people as the fodder & the combatants, and Zelenskyy agreed to that arrangement.

It was at that point that I no longer supported Ukraine or Zelenskyy, for Zelenskyy had just proven that he is as evil as the entire Democrat Party, and a majority of the Republican Party.

How you can support a man like Zelenskyy who willingly puts his nation, and more importantly, her citizens in harms way is beyond my comprehension to be quite honest.

Perhaps you can tell me how you live with yourself knowing that you have promoted the death & destruction they are now facing.

105 posted on 01/17/2023 11:45:10 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Robert DeLong

“If there are such laws, then the U.S. would be held to those laws, would they not?”

Yes, they should.

“But that’s okay, because we are the good guys, even when they are corrupt & lawless, according to you.”

Where did I say that? If you can’t quote me saying it, then you are just falsely attributing statements to me, which is what liars do. You’re not a liar, are you?

“Russia was providing defensive weapons so that the Ukrainian citizens could protect themselves from the terrorism they were facing at the hands of the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion/Regiment of the Ukrainian National Guard”

Azov was not part of the Ukrainian National Guard at that time. And Azov did not possess any combat aircraft, yet Russia had provided the “separatists” with anti-aircraft weapons (which they used to shoot down Malaysian Airlines Flight 17, so there is no use denying it). So your excuse is blatantly false. Russia was providing them with military weapons of war, to fight the Ukrainian regular military, which is fomenting a revolution in a foreign country.


108 posted on 01/17/2023 12:03:35 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson