Posted on 01/10/2023 6:00:46 PM PST by shadowlands1960
I looked and it does not seem JJ is associated with myocarditis.
I couldn’t find any. The clots were concerning though. I’m still taking an aspirin a day.
“NEW” normal...
i don’t think so
A baby aspirin?
I took one for a while. Not because of the vaccine, just in general.
Standard 10gr...
“Spike proteins are twisted protein pieces basically like prions.”
What is your source for that?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25855-2
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202003.0422/v1
FOAD, btw
“Feature Article — No. This Study Does Not Prove What You Think It Does: Part III”
This study does not prove that RNA from the COVID-19 vaccine changes DNA.
Study
Alden M, Falla FO, Yang D, et al. Intracellular reverse transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in vitro in human liver. Current Issues in Molecular Biology.
Brief summary
In the study, the authors infected a human liver cell line with the Pfizer version of the COVID-19 vaccine. They used different concentrations of the vaccine and multiple timepoints to measure:
Conversion of RNA into DNA in the cells
The quantity of a genetic tool called LINE-1
The presence of DNA sequences similar to the vaccine RNA in the nuclei of these cells
Misconception
Some pointed to this paper as proof that COVID-19 vaccines alter DNA. However, this is not an appropriate conclusion from this paper for several reasons:
1)Perhaps most importantly, this experiment was done on cells being grown in a lab. Said another way, it was an “in vitro” experiment. In vitro experiments are done all the time and they are important for providing information and clues as to what might happen in a person (“in vivo”). However, to make a conclusion about what is happening in people, one must have some evidence that it is actually happening in people, not just that it might be possible. The authors acknowledged this when they wrote, “At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome. Further studies are needed …”. They go on to suggest two alternative experimental methods for getting more information.
2)The authors used a cancerous liver cell line. This is important for two reasons; both of which were acknowledged by the authors. First, cancerous cell lines replicate, whereas our liver cells typically are not replicating. As such, even if DNA representing the viral RNA was integrated into the cell, no other cells with the altered DNA would be produced. The authors also pointed out that this cell line has been shown to have genetic and protein expression differences specific to RNA metabolism. This means that what is seen in these cells may not be representative of what would happen in non-cancerous liver cells (or even a different line of cancerous liver cells). Second, they measured LINE-1 activity. Importantly, LINE-1 has been associated with various disease-related conditions, including cancer. It has also been shown to affect immune responses. For these reasons, while the changes related to LINE-1 are interesting, we can’t be sure the effects would be the same in a non-cancerous cell line. The authors also made this point by stating, “The exact regulation of LINE-1 activity in response to BNT162b2 merits further study.”
3)Finally, as the authors pointed out, expression of LINE-1 has been shown to increase during viral infections, including with SARS-CoV-2 virus. In fact, some scientists have suggested that integration of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material into human cells could be why some people still test positive by PCR well after they have recovered from their infection. However, it is important to note that more information would be needed to prove this hypothesis as well. The more likely explanation is that the virus is undergoing an incomplete cycle of replication, where the genetic material (RNA) is produced but whole virus particles are not.
Problem with interpretation
Logical fallacy called hasty generalization (It is important to note in this case, that the misconception was not because of the quality of the science or the messaging of the authors, but rather because others took the findings out of context.)
https://www.chop.edu/news/feature-article-no-study-does-not-prove-what-you-think-it-does-part3
According to the Japanese, nattokinase will.
Nattokinase is the active ingredient (responsible for breaking down blood clots) of natto, which is a fermented soybean dish many Japanese eat for breakfast. It was discovered after researchers noticed the Japanese had fewer heart attacks than expected given how much they smoked.
Degradative Effect of Nattokinase on Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2
by Takashi Tanikawa 1,*,†,Yuka Kiba 2,†,James Yu 3,Kate Hsu 3,Shinder Chen 3,Ayako Ishii 4,Takami Yokogawa 2ORCID,Ryuichiro Suzuki 5,Yutaka Inoue 1ORCID andMasashi Kitamura 2,*
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged as a pandemic and has inflicted enormous damage on the lives of the people and economy of many countries worldwide. However, therapeutic agents against SARS-CoV-2 remain unclear. SARS-CoV-2 has a spike protein (S protein), and cleavage of the S protein is essential for viral entry. Nattokinase is produced by Bacillus subtilis var. natto and is beneficial to human health. In this study, we examined the effect of nattokinase on the S protein of SARS-CoV-2. When cell lysates transfected with S protein were incubated with nattokinase, the S protein was degraded in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that S protein on the cell surface was degraded when nattokinase was added to the culture medium. Thus, our findings suggest that nattokinase exhibits potential for the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infection via S protein degradation.
https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/17/5405
“CONCLUSIONS:
Immunoprofiling of vaccinated adolescents and young adults revealed that the mRNA vaccine–induced immune responses did not differ between individuals who developed myocarditis and individuals who did not.
However, free spike antigen was detected in the blood of adolescents and young adults who developed post-mRNA vaccine myocarditis, advancing insight into its potential underlying cause.”
[go figure: all those spike proteins the experimental mRNA gene therapy tricks your ribosomes into manufacturing don’t always just “disappear”]
“What does that mean?”
antigen is another term for the spike protein that your ribosomes were tricked into making by the experimental gene therapy covid vax, and it means the stuff stays in your body a LONG time, long enough to kill young, healthy, athletic males
“Do MR spikes ever go away once injected into you blood stream via vaccination?”
essentially, they don’t know ...
what it means is that those who failed to clear the spike proteins and/or continued to manufacture it long after the mRNA shots were given are the ones who developed myocarditis ...
In 3/21 I had J&J - ended up in ER 3 times with pounding heart but they said I was dehydrated...Something that had never happened to me before. Had 2 D-dimer tests & no clots.
I seem to be ok now. Regret the shot but at least it was J&J. Tried to detox...not sure if it worked.
How are the spikes unlike prions?
“Some pointed to this paper as proof that COVID-19 vaccines alter DNA.”
I never used word “prove” or proof.
I said it showed that reverse transcription is possible. The statement by the experts experts was that it is impossible for the “vaccine” to change DNA. But they did not mention body mechanism that might make the changes in the presence of the mRNA.
This whole event is a bunch of crap and lies. The “experts” are never going to tell the truth about why this has been handled like it has.
This is a crime against humanity. Some one must eventually be held accountable for this insane horror.
That helps. Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.