Posted on 01/03/2023 9:40:46 AM PST by Kazan
Putin has really stepped into it this time!
It’s all over for him now!
Thought it was 600.
The constant Russian casualty numbers remind me of 70s SoS McNamarra’s VC death totals that day..
BTW, how is the Kreminna-Svatove highway looking these days? Or the islands in the Dnipro as the Ukrainians creep towards the other side?
Yup! He’s as toasted as PDJT after the tax records release right? 🤔👍
If history is any guide, once you start playing the McNamarra body count game, you are losing.
In point of fact there’s very little Western reaction to to Ukraine roasting another bevy of Russian soldiers as it’s become fairly routine.
“this is the first time since the war started in February 2022 that Russia has suffered more than 50 casualties in one engagement in one day”
This nonsense reminds me of those saying global warming is causing severe cold and heavy snow. Pure nonsense designed to push wartime propaganda.
The West is using its soft Media power yet again.
Let's see if the Duran picks up on this.
Larry Johnson is a running joke. He claims that he knows that this is the first time that Russia has suffered more than 50 deaths in a single engagement because it has never been reported on Telegram before? Really? 😂😂😂😂😂
Also, now February is the new “turning point” in the war? That seems to be a constantly moving target.
All the West cares about is how much money they get out of it.
And the Ukrainian people are piggies in the middle.
Eleventy-billion.
One assessment said that the building itself could only hold 100-200 troops.
Numbers don’t matter that much in this case.
What matters is this was US provided missiles that landed on Russian soil. That was a first and why the death toll was so high.
But more importantly it represents a serious escalation in US involvement, both real and perceived, which may or may not be a good thing.
” Thought it was 600.”
More likely. There’s reports of trucks leaving the scene piled high with the dead bodies of Russians.
Billions of Russian dead.
But more importantly it represents a serious escalation in US involvement, both real and perceived, which may or may not be a good thing.
Alex Christoforou was pointing out that the Russian readouts deliberatly referred to missiles as "US-supplied", which is apparently not a good thing in their view.
More propaganda analysis, based on assumption piled on assumption about motives and emotion rather than reality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.