[kiryandil]

What matters is this was US provided missiles that landed on Russian soil. That was a first and why the death toll was so high.

But more importantly it represents a serious escalation in US involvement, both real and perceived, which may or may not be a good thing.

Alex Christoforou was pointing out that the Russian readouts deliberatly referred to missiles as "US-supplied", which is apparently not a good thing in their view.

[Vermont Lt]

Just to be clear, it’s OK for Iran to provide drones, but it’s bad for the US?

Honestly, this is payback for Korea, Vietnam, and every other place where Russian weapons have killed and maimed US troops.

The logic being used to defend Russia lately is mind boggling.

Of course, the response will be name calling and insults.

[Boogieman]

“which is apparently not a good thing in their view”

Gee, maybe the Russians should have considered that before they supplied weapons to every terrorist group and revolutionary movement that wanted to kill Americans during the 20th century?