To: E. Pluribus Unum
You're the guy who doesn't believe in the rule of law. There is no Constitutional basis for the Court to order the relief requested. The Court would be just making up that authority out of thin air just because you want that result.
If you believed in the rule of law, you'd be looking for provision in the Constitution that authorizes the Supreme Court to remove members of Congress or the President. No such provision exists.
To: Bruce Campbells Chin
You believe that elected officials have sovereign immunity from being prosecuted for their crimes.
Doesn’t sound like you believe in the rule of law to me.
39 posted on
12/22/2022 7:35:40 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████.)
To: Bruce Campbells Chin
There is no Constitutional basis for the Court to order the relief requested.You're telling me to read about the SG taking over the case when you don't even know that the writ states exactly where and what the Constitutional basis is.
Do you need me to point out the exact words or can you find them yourself?
Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al.
41 posted on
12/22/2022 7:42:32 PM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson