Posted on 12/14/2022 2:37:10 PM PST by jmaroneps37
Be sincere and show support - they need it.
“The historic significance of Brunson v Adams ranks with the signing of the Declaration of Independence.”
Gotta remember this steaming pile when the Supreme Court declines to even have a hearing on the case.
How will the court enforce any ruling?
And they obviously know this.
Bkmk SCOTUS
Judicial doesn’t enforce. Executive does.
It still helps show right vs. wrong to idiots if the Executive refuses to enforce and Congress refuses to hold the Executive responsible.
The awful truth is that we’re likely not going to be able to vote our way out of this.
If the Supreme Court decides not to grant a writ of certiorari, the case is done. This is the fate of over 99% of the cases which are appealed to the Supreme Court.
Much to much is being made of this case. The lower courts rejected it on the grounds of standing. I will be very surprised if the Supreme court grants a writ of certiorari.
The chance of that happening, I suspect, is much less than 1 percent.
“On the docket” just means they received it. These guys aren’t even lawyers. This is going NO WHERE.
The best that the Supreme Court can do is to remand the lower court to try the case.
Lots of possibilities.
This is a civil case. SCOTUS rules in favor of plaintiffs, then it goes to criminal courts. Or, in view of the severity, to military tribunals.
I thought it said they had put the case on their docket for 1/6/23?
You only say that because you’re correct...
P.S. I hear a secret server from Frankfurt Germany is inbound.
I think just as important as this case may be to the author, the one that NC Republicans have before the court is pretty darn close.
If the prevail, then there’s no place for the Left to turn to when they want to manipulate voting laws. If a state legislature passes something and everything is legit, no place to go. And from what I’ve read, NC Republicans have the law on their side.’
They may not be able to do anything about what happened in 2020 or in November, but going forward, if any Republican led legislature has the ‘nads to pass some stricter laws, there’s nowhere for the Dem’s to go. So, no more brining in Elias and his crew of henchmen.
“The best that the Supreme Court can do is to remand the lower court to try the case.”
Well, the Supreme Court could choose to say “we have original jursidiction here” and take the case. They’re not going to do that with this case, and it would be pretty rare for them to do it, but they certainly can do that.
No, it’s just yet another in an endless stream of misleading articles about this case. The case is not on the docket. A plea for certiorari is on the docket.
Correct. I would wager that the chance is about as close to 0% as could be imagined.
That various rightwing grifters are still pumping the mere existence of this cert petition, touting it as significant, and that various folks about are biting on this self-evident grift, is the real tell.
That's the discussion date. The decision to take up the case or reject it is that date.
You don’t really think that any court anywhere in this land is going to take any office away from any Democrat, do you?
You might just as well believe in the tooth fairy.
Honest prudence and search for truth! That’s what we need.
Original jurisdiction means that the Supreme Court is the first, and only, Court to hear a case.
Barking up the wrong tree, Boogieman. It's been heard in both State and District Court.
Exact date and time of Dismissal: 10am ET, Jan. 23, 2023.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.